https://youtu.be/mvKOz5sEtjw?si=FcGgmUm8GvC6GfC2
❤3

Channel
@boomrangdocs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
126subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002600570748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boomrangdocs |
| Description | اینجا کانال بوم رنگه! محل هم نشینی سینمای مستفل و هنرهای تجسمی دریچه ای رو به دنیای هنرمندان کمتر شناخته شده اما آینده دار هنرهای تجسمی ایران. ما هر هفته، یک فیلم مستند کوتاه برای شما آماده می کنیم تا با زندگی و آثار این هنرمندان آشنا شوید |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boomrangdocs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 126 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 83.0% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/mvKOz5sEtjw?si=FcGgmUm8GvC6GfC2
❤3
🔘 یادبود زندهیاد «افشین پیرهاشمی» و نمایش مستند «میتونی این راز رو نگه داری؟» در قالب سلسله نشستهای «عصر بومرنگ»، عصر دوشنبه ۱۷ آذر ۱۴۰۴ در سالن استاد شهناز خانه هنرمندان ایران برگزار شد. گزارش تصویری: لیلا ابراهیمی #خانه_هنرمندان_ایران #سالن_استاد_شهناز @iranartists
❤5💩1
تیزر مستند «میتونی این راز رو نگه داری؟» منتشر شد فیلم مستند «میتونی این راز رو نگه داری؟» به کارگردانی کیوان مهرگان در بزرگداشت اولین سالگرد افشین پیرهاشمی، دوشنبه ۱۷ آذر ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ برای نخستین بار به نمایش عمومی در میآید. در این مستند گروهی از اعضای خانواده ، دوستان، همکاران و هنرمندان بخش هایی از زندگی افشین پیر هاشمی نقاش ایرانی را روایت می کنند.
❤7
◀️ اکران مستند «میتونی این راز رو نگه داری؟» در خانه هنرمندان فیلم مستند «میتونی این راز رو نگه داری؟» به کارگردانی کیوان مهرگان و تهیه کنندگی مشترک بهروز داوری و کیوان مهرگان، در حاشیه بزرگداشت اولین سالگرد افشین پیرهاشمی، دوشنبه ۱۷ آذر ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ برای نخستین بار به نمایش عمومی در میآید. ▶️ @khabarcinema
❤6
https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6677692/
یادبود افشین پیرهاشمی در خانه هنرمندان ایران @boomrandocs
❤4
مستندهای بومرنگ این هفته منتشر نمیشود.
❤5😢1
https://youtu.be/XaAmOrPPS_A?si=HT9l8ZP-ny53-JaW
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
🕊2
روی میزش همیشه چند کتاب هست؛ روانشناسی و عرفان. بازوهایش قویاند، اما دلش مهربانتر است. او همسایهی ماست. اواسط پخش برنامهی «بومرنگ» بود که به چند وکیل، وزیر، پزشک و مهندس پیشنهاد داده بودم برای تداوم مستندهای بومرنگ، آثار هنرمندان را خریداری کنند. اما همهشان پاسخ منفی دادند. حجم «نه»هایی که در آن مدت شنیدم، بیسابقه بود. آن شب کلید دفتر را فراموش کرده بودم و منتظر ماشین بودم. ساعت از دوازده گذشته بود. آقا نوی…
❤5👍2
https://youtu.be/fXLBuP70AzA?si=TefkVS3BUjlvLpnJ
❤1
به بهانه سفرترامپ به خاورمیانه جف کونز ترامپ نیست! کیوان مهرگان یک ضربالمثل من در آوردی میگوید: "بدترین هنرمندان از بهترین سیاستمداران عزیزترند" پس، مقایسهی یک هنرمند با یک سیاستمدار نه تنها رایج نیست بلکه غیر ممکن است؛ اما در جهان ذهنیات، غیر ممکن، غیر ممکن است و گاهی برای درک برخی پدیدهها چارهای جز مقایسه وجود ندارد. پرسش این است: هنرمند پرآوازهای چون جف کونز با دونالد جی. ترامپ، رئیسجمهور کنونی ایالات متحد…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @boomrangdocs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 458,316 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@boomrangdocs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بوم رنگ | مستند های کوتاه” (@boomrangdocs), 126 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boomrangdocs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.