Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bookxana

Channel

Bookxana

@bookxana

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

982subscribers

+96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002135859568
TypeChannel
Username@bookxana
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bookxana

Growth

883990936.57 August 2026 — 886 subscribers8 August 2026 — 886 subscribers8 August 2026 — 883 subscribers16 August 2026 — 927 subscribers24 August 2026 — 990 subscribers30 August 2026 — 982 subscribers9827 August 202630 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 23 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 867–1,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:54982-8
24 Aug 2026, 06:51990+63
16 Aug 2026, 20:44927+44
8 Aug 2026, 12:05883-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:05886no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:48886first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 982 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,793
Reactions total327
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10030.2%
5215.7%
🔥3711.2%
🤣257.55%
💯236.95%
💔206.04%
👍195.74%
❤‍🔥144.23%
👎144.23%
🤯133.93%
😢61.81%
🗿41.21%
🙊20.604%
🤓20.604%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Yolg'izmanmi?.. Bunga ko'ndimmi?.. Qanday qilib? Taqdir deya tasalli beraymi o'zimga?! Yoki bularning bari xatolarimning sababi va oqibati bo'lgan oddiy voqelik ekanini tan olaymi? Yo'q. Aslo yo'q. Bu mudhish voqelikni bo'ynimga olishga jur'atim yetmaydi. Yaxshisi, hayotdan noliyman. Shunisi qulayroq. Omadsizligimni ro'kach qilib siqilaman. Mungli ohanglar ta'siriga otaman o'zimni. Qalbimga qora afyundek ta'sir

💯5😢3

6 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC266 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ulg'ayganing sari hammasi Xudoning nazoratida ekaniga yanada qattiqroq ishona boshlaysan. Hatto bolaligingda ham mo'jizalarga bu qadar ishonmas eding. Farqi shundaki, bolaligingda mo'jizalarni o'z ko'zlaring bilan ko'rishni istar eding. Katta bo'lgach, mo'jizalarning nobud bo'lganini ko'rasan. Eng yomoni ularni o'ldirgan o'zing bo'lib chiqasan. @bookxana

💯173👍2

6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC244 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...ba'zi kimsalarning peshonasiga baxtli bo'lish o'yib yozilgan bo'ladi. U yo'ldan yuradimi, bu yo'ldanmi, baribir. Unaqalarga omad kulib boqaveradi.

🔥196

6 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC265 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

...omadli insonlarning omadining siri, ularning omadli ekanliklarida.

🤯13😁6👍2

5 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC297 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sizlar aholining kamyob, 2-3% odamlaridan birisizlar. Instagramda ko'p ko'rgansiz-ku: “Bu savolning javobini faqat 2% yoki 3% odamlar topa olar ekan”, deb qarmoq tashlanadi. O'zingizni sinash uchun savolni qanday o'qib qo'yganingizni bilmay qolasiz. Bunaqa savollarning javobi bitta: ularni o'qimaslik. O'tkazib yuborish kerak. Lekin hozir gap bu haqida emas. Siz diniymi, badiiymi, boringki motivatsion kitob o'qiysiz

😁16🔥63

5 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC290 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— Tog'a, nimaga siyosat bilan xotinni bir-biriga o'xshatasiz? — Ikkalasigayam aybdorlik hissi begona.

😁24🗿4👎1🤓1

5 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC286 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bu havoda esing og'ib qolishi hech gapmas. Aqlni yo'qotishning eng yomon jihati: siyosatga va xotinga yoqmaydigan haqiqatlarni valdirab qo'yish xavfi bor.

🤣13😁5👎1

5 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC292 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Yaxtay suvga boshimni yuvmasam bo'lmaydi. Ko'p gapirvoryapman. Hammasi issiqdan. Avgust atmen. Hali kemapti

🤣10😁5👎1

5 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC288 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nimaga ko'p qarasak, asta-sekin yoqmay qoladi-ku. Bu mashhur iqtibos, bilasizlar. Bobomning gaplarini ma'nosini endi tushinyapman. Erkak kishi xotini bilan ko'p gaplashmaydi, derdilar.

😁10👎1

5 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC282 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...eng asabga tegadigani, xafa bo'lishga haqqi yo'q odamlarning xafa bo'lib olishi. Eng yomoni nohaqligidan o'zini xabari bo'lmaydi. Yerni sabriga qoyil. Men bo'lsam marsgami, quyoshgami tuflab yuborardim, bunaqalarni.

😁16👍2👎1

5 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC286 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

...pul va obro'ga erishish uchun yozilgan kitobni, komilikka erishish uchun o'qidi. Ikkalasi ham erishmadi.

🔥7👎1

5 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC297 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Odamlar aynitadi dedim. Uzoqlashdim odamlardan. Natijasi o'zimni o'zgartirish bo'ldi. Odamlardan uzoqlashganda angladimki, yuksalish va haqiqiy natijalarga erishish odamlar bilan bo'lar ekan. Endi qaytish vaqti kelgandir...odamlar orasiga.

👍106👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bookxana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 90,661 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bookxana” (@bookxana), 982 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookxana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.