Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⏳FOX • Книжные цитаты

@booksqu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,714subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001384920207
TypeChannel
Username@booksqu
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/booksqu

Growth

9,7149,7339,723.56 August 2026 — 9,732 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,732 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,722 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,714 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,711–9,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:179,714-8
10 Aug 2026, 23:189,722-11
7 Aug 2026, 14:149,733+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:009,732no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:499,732first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

816 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯31438.5%
24429.9%
👍18622.8%
🔥455.51%
💔212.57%
❤‍🔥40.49%
10.123%
🍌10.123%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 816reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2025 to 26 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @booksqu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 January 2025 to 26 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,630 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Взрослые очень любят цифры. Когда рассказываешь им, что у тебя появился новый друг, они никогда не спросят о самом главном. Никогда они не скажут: «А какой у него голос? В какие игры он любит играть? Ловит ли он бабочек?» Они спрашивают: «Сколько ему лет? Сколько у него братьев? Сколько он весит? Сколько зарабатывает его отец?» И после этого воображают, что узнали человека. Когда говоришь взрослым: «Я видел красивый

👍14💯119

29 Dec 2025, 12:59 UTC≈2,870 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У неё для каждого была улыбка, да такая, что невозможно было не улыбнуться в ответ: не тупая безликая улыбочка вежливости, а настоящая, привлекающая улыбка, вызывающая реакцию. Так улыбаются люди, уверенные в том, что в каждом можно найти добро, и они обязательно его находят. ____ 👉🏼 Ирвин Уэлш "Кошмары аиста марабу"

16💯8👍71

14 Dec 2025, 14:49 UTC≈2,650 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

— Хочешь в кино? — Я не хочу в кино. Я хотела прожить с тобой полвека, родить мальчика, похожего на тебя, и умереть в один день — с тобой. А в кино — нет, не хочу. ____ 👉🏼 Марта Кетро "Горький шоколад. Книга утешений"

👍15💯65💔2

28 Nov 2025, 12:55 UTC≈2,580 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Закаты пропитаны грустью. Потому что каждый раз, провожая его, думаешь: каким ни был, удачным или неудачным, день — это мой день, и он уходит навсегда. ____ 👉🏼 Эльчин Сафарли "Я вернусь"

13💯13👍3

15 Nov 2025, 14:26 UTC≈2,510 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Так странно — участвовать в чьей-то жизни вплоть до мелочей, а потом вдруг не знать совсем ничего. А еще странно, когда думаешь, что знаешь кого-то, а потом понимаешь, что, возможно, не знал о нем совсем ничего. ____ 👉🏼 Колин Гувер "Воспоминание о нем"

15💯15👍5

13 Sept 2025, 18:01 UTC≈4,510 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Так пользуйтесь же своей молодостью, пока она не ушла. Не тратьте понапрасну золотые дни, слушая нудных святош, не пытайтесь исправлять то, что неисправимо, не отдавайте свою жизнь невеждам, пошлякам и ничтожествам, следуя ложныи идеям и нездоровым стремлениям нашей эпохи. Живите! Живите той чудесной жизнью, что скрыта в вас. Ничего не упускайте, вечно ищите все новых ощущений! Ничего не бойтесь! ____ 👉🏼 Оскар Уайльд

💯209👍5🍌1

7 Sept 2025, 12:50 UTC≈3,630 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мы — авторы каждого следующего мгновения. ____ 👉🏼 Крис Прентисс "Счастье по дзен"

💯18🔥97

20 Jul 2025, 11:22 UTC≈5,140 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А разве нужна причина, чтобы поцеловать человека? Чтобы сказать, как нуждаешься в нём, и периодически напоминать об этом? Разве нужна причина, чтобы просто любить? ____ 👉🏼 Вячеслав Прах «Кофейня»

26💯13👍3

1 Jun 2025, 16:27 UTC≈6,020 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я знаю, что могу жить без неё, но мне хотелось бы встретить её снова — встретить, чтобы сказать то, чего никогда не произносил, пока мы были вместе: «Я люблю тебя больше, чем себя». Если бы я мог произнести эти слова, то смог бы и двигаться дальше, вперёд, и успокоился бы, потому что эта любовь даровала бы мне свободу. ____ 👉🏼 Пауло Коэльо «Заир»

17💯17👍6

9 May 2025, 16:15 UTC≈5,580 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Для того чтобы сказать «я тебя люблю», совсем необязательно говорить «я тебя люблю», хотя иногда это необходимо. Иногда достаточно сказать «мне с тобой очень хорошо», или «спасибо», или «ты самая лучшая». Если ты помнишь, словами можно пользоваться как ножом, а можно превратить их в цветы. ____ 👉🏼 Элия Барсело "Хранилище ужасных слов"

💯289👍8

27 Apr 2025, 15:26 UTC≈4,810 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Больше звонить было некому. Я стоял с телефонной трубкой посреди огромного города, десять миллионов человек слонялись вокруг меня, и совершенно не с кем поговорить. ____ 👉🏼 Харуку Мураками "Охота на овец"

💔19👍9🔥6

1 Apr 2025, 16:00 UTC≈5,930 views44 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Любить — это не значит смотреть друг на друга, это значит смотреть в одном направлении. ____ 👉🏼 Антуан де Сент Экзюпери "Маленький принц"

💯1915👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @booksqu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,113,557 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⏳FOX • Книжные цитаты” (@booksqu), 9,714 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booksqu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.