7 measurements spanning 32 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 23:20
229
-4
30 Aug 2026, 09:58
233
+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:06
232
-2
14 Aug 2026, 12:59
234
+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:05
232
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:44
232
+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:38
231
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5366477674036351067
39
31.7%
custom 5215618708700958893
31
25.2%
custom 5465404295715247345
28
22.8%
custom 5395379453863948203
13
10.6%
custom 5350788742619630472
12
9.76%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @booksoul_s. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
вчера дочитала вторую часть ‘гарри поттера’ и сегодня уже прочла больше половины ‘узника азкабана’
🌟интересный факт:
это всегда был мой любимый фильм из всей вселенной, а теперь подозреваю, что книга станет для меня чем-то намного большим, чем был некогда фильм
какая часть гарри поттера у вас самая любимая и почему?
я пока не в ресурсе для поста с таро, поэтому на этой неделе дам себе время отдохнуть, переосмыслить этот формат и вообще понять, хочу ли продолжать его делать
а сегодня я уезжаю на природу без интернета и вернусь к вам только в среду🤩🤩🌟
💚а вы пока делитесь тем, что сейчас читаете и как начинается ваш последний летний месяц
приносят ли вам пользу еженедельные посты с таро раскладами?
🤩да, читаю каждую неделю и хочу, чтобы рубрика осталась25%
🤍читаю время от времени, рубрику стоит оставить13%
🤩почти не читаю, но не против, чтобы рубрика осталась46%
🤩не читаю, мне эта рубрика не интересна29%
🤩хочу, чтобы рубрика осталась, но изменился формат (напишу свое предложение в комментариях0%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🕊до последнего думала, что не буду участвовать в марафоне случайных книг, но вечером решила, что стоит попробовать
написала список из 20 книг, и каким-то чудесным чудом мне выпал ‘королевский убийца’ робин хобб, которого я как раз собиралась прочитать еще в июле
:: до сих пор не понимаю, как так совпало, но все же очень приятно
🤍🤍первую книгу я читала больше года назад и уже почти ничего не помню, поэтому вчера про…
на моей памяти впервые за все время существования книжного клуба с подругами мы единогласно решили не дочитывать книгу, просто потому, что всем скучно📚🐚🥡
для чтения в июле мы выбрали ‘чувство и чувствительность’ джейн остин, но никто из нас даже не приблизился к середине
:: текст не отталкивает, но и не дарит какого-то искреннего желания поскорее перевернуть страницу, чтобы узнать, что будет дальше
🐑🤩я все же дочита…
-`🗒´-за весь июль было всего два дня, когда я не брала книгу в руки-`🗒´-
мне казалось, что такими темпами сквозь меня пройдет не меньше 6-7 книг
👓и только 22 июля я дочитала
👓первое произведение
👓в этом месяце…
:: хоть я и не из тех людей, кто трясется за количество, но я все равно боялась, что больше не успею дочитать ни одной книги
📚🌟меня расстраивало, что я наконец начала активно и стабильно заниматься своим люби…
я опять к вам без книжных постов
🙇♀️🖤зато готовлю одну интересную рубрику, которую ранее ни у кого не встречала
❤🤍🧴а сегодня был очень насыщенный, яркий день, потому что к нам приехала подруга из другого города, и мы отлично проводили время вместе
:: обошли полгорода пешком, много разговаривали, обсуждали, как можно усовершенствовать наш книжный клуб, делали красивые фото, совершенно случайно попали на потрясающее…
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @booksoul_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
приносят ли вам пользу еженедельные посты с таро раскладами?
🤩да, читаю каждую неделю и хочу, чтобы рубрика осталась25%
🤍читаю время от времени, рубрику стоит оставить13%
🤩почти не читаю, но не против, чтобы рубрика осталась46%
🤩не читаю, мне эта рубрика не интересна29%
🤩хочу, чтобы рубрика осталась, но изменился формат (напишу свое предложение в комментариях0%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хозяйка книжной таверны” (@booksoul_s), 229 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booksoul_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
