Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ГОЛОСА СТРАНИЦ📚

Channel

ГОЛОСА СТРАНИЦ📚

@books_valaam

Not marked by Telegram, checked 3 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002196955562
TypeChannel
Username@books_valaam
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/books_valaam

Growth

1401421412 Sept 2026, 23:45 — 140 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 00:00 — 140 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 15:58 — 142 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 23:453 Sept 2026, 15:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 15:58142+2
3 Sept 2026, 00:00140no change
2 Sept 2026, 23:45140first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
28m 11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9546.8%
👍4220.7%
🔥2713.3%
👀104.93%
😁83.94%
💯62.96%
👏41.97%
🎉31.48%
🤗31.48%
🕊20.985%
🤨20.985%
custom 528327811019888021410.493%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2024 to 21 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2024, 07:09 UTC558 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @chrisma_centerVideo

Кому нужен "ИИ-Христос"? Ранее мы писали, что в США изобрели цифрового католического "священника о. Иустина", который должен был в онлайн формате отвечать на вопросы о вере. В Швейцарии пошли дальше. В одной из католических часовен Люцерны в исповедальне установили искусственный интеллект, который в "аватаре" Иисуса Христа "взаимодействует" с верующими. ИИ генерирует духовные советы через изображение, видимое внутр

👀92

Signed о. Евлогий

21 Nov 2024, 07:09 UTC462 viewsread 3 September 2026

План "Апокалипсис" запущен?

Signed о. Евлогий

20 Nov 2024, 15:39 UTC466 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Друзья! Напишите, пожалуйста, как у вас с чтением "Полунощницы"? Читаете? Какие впечатления? Нужна ли нам ещё встреча по этой книге? Есть ли в романе какой-то фрагмент, который вас особенно заинтересовал?

🤨2👀1👍1

Signed о. Евлогий

18 Nov 2024, 17:43 UTC930 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Замечательный был вчера эфир с отцом Александром Зайцевым!💯 Поговорили о многом: 🟩об искусственном интеллекте, нейросетях и их развитии, 🟥о плюсах и минусах его использования, 🟩о роли Церкви и священников в рамках заданной темы... О том, что человеческое общение и Таинства никто никогда не заменит‼️ даже при самом развитом ИИ и голосовых помощниках. Батюшка озвучил свои мысли про тик-ток, краткие видео (шортсы), зав

9🔥5🎉3👍1

Signed Полина Кузьмина

18 Nov 2024, 13:10 UTC357 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Слова валаамского схиигумена Серафима (Покровского), к нашему вчерашнему разговору с о. Александром: «Мы все страдаем от одиночества, разобщенности, хотя сейчас приумножились всякие средства информации, появились и мобильные телефоны, сообщения, электронные почты и так далее, всякие сайты (хотя я об этом совсем мало знаю), а все равно люди одиноки, каждый замкнут в себе, в своем мирке, в своих проблемах. Но это не то

13💯5👍1

Signed о. Евлогий

16 Nov 2024, 08:34 UTC819 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

О, времена! О, люди! А что же дальше будет И чем ознаменуется наш век? Искусственный восходит интеллект! Он сможет всё: пахать и сеять, Идеи разные проверить, Их отклонить иль подтвердить Да и лекарство сотворить. Отправить груз, где в нём нужда, Не причинив ему вреда. Жилище, чисто уберёт, Любую информацию найдёт, Продукты по полезности сравнит, Стихи иль музыку закажут – сочинит, Наверно может и постель застлать… Н

4👍3👏3😁2

Signed о. Евлогий

14 Nov 2024, 09:43 UTC≈1,070 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С радостью сообщаем вам о предстоящей нашей новой онлайн-встрече! 👍 В это воскресенье, 17 ноября в 19:30 у нас будет эфир с клириком Валаамского Санкт-Петербургского подворья священником Александром Зайцевым. Тема: «Этика отношений человека и искусственного интеллекта». Отец Александр для прихожан ведет на подворье ряд кружков, в том числе библейский и киноклуб, является опытным священником (в сане более 25 лет),

7🔥5👍2custom 52832781101988802141

Signed о. Евлогий

7 Nov 2024, 20:02 UTC301 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А это весьма забавный отзыв от нашего участника Михаила Рузанова😊 Миша увлёкся Т. Манном: "Как всем нам известно, некоторое время назад, по совокупности самых странных и нелепых ошибок я начал читать. Это было бы ещё полбеды, но почему-то Боженьке вздумалось познакомить меня поближе не с кем-нибудь нормальным, а именно сразу с товарищем Томасом Манном. Чтобы представить хотя бы в какой-то мере ужас моего положения,

🔥6😁6👍5

Signed Полина Кузьмина

7 Nov 2024, 19:13 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На Московских улицах весна😄🌷🌱 Вчера у нас прошла первая очно-заочная встреча. Как вам?😊 На встрече сошлись во мнении, что многое в романе далеко отстоит от реальности, но при этом там затронуто несколько очень важных реальных тем, связанных с историей монастыря. Чтобы не запутаться, предлагаю ознакомиться с интервью с Геннадием Добровым, который писал портреты инвалидов войны, в том числе и Валаамского интерната: h

8

Signed Полина Кузьмина

6 Nov 2024, 15:28 UTC250 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Школа открыта, так что просто тяните дверь справа от входа в храм, и наверх до конца

4👍1🤗1

Signed Полина Кузьмина

6 Nov 2024, 14:23 UTC237 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤗2

Signed Полина Кузьмина

6 Nov 2024, 14:21 UTC231 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8👍1

Signed Полина Кузьмина

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @books_valaam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Валаамский монастырь
@valaam · 34,883
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ГОЛОСА СТРАНИЦ📚” (@books_valaam), 142 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/books_valaam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.