Channel
@bookprintiing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002114858158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bookprintiing |
| Description | @BooksPrintingBot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 18 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bookprintiing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 60 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 60 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 18 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 94.1% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2024 to 12 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As we have had some questions about the book regarding what it will be look like and whether it is the whole Tawheed series in one etc., we were planning to split the Tawheed series into 3 volumes. And for now, we will only print the first book, which contains class 1-12.
❤10
Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله said: "Giving Sadaqah (ie: charity on Fridays) has a distinct advantage over the rest of the weekdays. Its superiority is similar to giving charity in the month of Ramadan in contrast to the rest of the months." [Zād al-Maʿād 1/394]
👍1
Current status of donations: 275,83€ Alhamdulillah
❤4
With Allah's permission, we are launching a fundraising campaign for the printing of the book "Sharh Al-Usul Ath-Thalaatha" by Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله. We had already given away the book privately among some brothers and sisters, as well as the book "Gems of Ramadan", also by Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله. With the money we raised privately a few months ago, we were able to print and give away a total of 56 books Alhamdulill…
'Id is over, gifts have been bought, Zakat al-Fitr has been paid, and thus we can start with the donations, In shaa Allah ta'ala)) And remember, it doesn't matter how much you can donate, Allah azza wa jall knows your intention and will reward you accordingly. Even your 5€ can help a brother or sister - living at the end of the world - to receive the book.
Which book should we print in bulk? All by Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
I hope you all understood it, I don't have time for something professional)) If you still have questions, the bot is in the description.
To summarize it again for you: 1. Create an account. 2. Click on "Print Project" or "Print Book." 3. Insert the PDF. 4. Choose whether you want hardcover or softcover, select the weight of the paper, and choose the paper type. 5. Upload the cover. (If you click on "Design Cover Freely," you can also edit the book spine on your PC and insert the title name. I would recommend this, as the spine is automatically gray i…
The website to print your own book: epubli.de This is just a cheap way for you to print your own book, but not for large quantities as it is really expensive.
❤1
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
📚 Ramadan Series by Shaykh Musa & Shaykh Ahmad حفظهم الله:
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bookprintiing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which book should we print in bulk? All by Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2024 to 12 April 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 825,423 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Book printing 📚” (@bookprintiing), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookprintiing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.