Channel
@bookdepth_undine_palace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001580089282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bookdepth_undine_palace |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bookdepth_undine_palace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 91 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 91 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 503 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 75.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 13.2% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 10.3% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝓣раф 𝓜онте-𝓚ристо Что ж дочитать книгу под утра - уже традиция? Я признаться не ожидала, что буду так впечатлена! Множество раз мне попадались видео с «Графом Монте-кристо» и фразой: «Завидуйте мне, я читаю эту книгу впервые». Что ж, и правда! Завидую себе, что прочитала её впервые! Прекрасный лёгкий язык, сюжет закрученный и не отпускающий из своих тисков до конца, легкие ненавязчивые аллюзии - невероятно! Я испы…
💋4❤🔥2👻1
🪶📜 𝓜не хотелось смешать начало XX века, Петербург и восток. Сначала я думала, что выйдет что-то фентезийное с элементами арабских сказок, а вышла... история о том, что услышит не тот, кто говорит с тобой на одном языке, а тот, кто чувствует с тобой на одном языке... Быть может, потом выложу ещё куда-нибудь, а пока что только тут оставлю ) Буду благодарна, если прочтёте ♡ #моикаракули_anya
❤2
𝓗астроение эклектичное 🏜️🌸 тургеневская девушка, сбежавшая в арабскую ночь; перемешать русский XIX век и средневековый восток комната создана чатом gpt
❤🔥7❤5
𝓞чень вдохновила меня эта идея из инстаграма 🖤 У «Графа Монте-Кристо» я прочла только 1 том пока что и арабские сказки послушала не все, однако погружаюсь в эти миры, поэтому пусть будет )
❤6
𝒘𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒓'𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒘𝒔 🪶 𝓟ешила выложить свой сборник сказок на Литрес и создала аккаунт в инстаграме, посвящённый своему творчеству Не знаю, будет ли что-то успешно, но не начнёшь - не узнаешь ) Говорят, что аккаунт про творчество лучше создавать в тик токе, но у меня он не работает Литрес Инстаграм буду благодарна за обратную связь ♡
❤7
𝟻𝟶 𝓞ттенков моего пинтернеста #aesthetics_anya
❤9
📚 𝓗е ожидала, что меня настолько увлечёт «Граф Монте-Кристо»! Сперва мне казалось, что я немного медленно разгоняюсь и ничего не успею прочесть за лето. Сейчас я уверена в обратном, мне осталась 261 страница в первом томе. Я невероятно заинтригована! 𝓨 Дюма очень лёгкий, приятный слог. Сюжет просто головокружительный. Ещё мне безумно по душе его лёгкие аллюзии на арабские сказки, Байрона. А как он создают загадку во…
❤6
🌺🌙 𝓐рабские 𝓒казки Возможно, кому-то покажется странным, что столь северный человек, как я обожает столь южные сказки. Возможно же, наоборот нет, потому что мне, живущей на грани реальности и сна положено обожать подобное. Я никогда не читала сборник сказок 1000 и 1 ночи полностью, некоторые истории читала не раз в детстве, но не помню названий, даже большую часть сюжетов помню размыто, но хорошо помню ощущение сн…
❤6
𝓗е случайно мне, видимо, захотелось вспомнить арабские сказки ) А ещё в начале было упоминание Гофмана, что мне тоже пришлось очень по сердцу. Про арабские сказки сейчас грянет поток ностальгии. Я прямо утонула в ней, прочитав, как Дантес принял Франца в пещере на Монте-Кристо, где нашел сокровища (на всякий скрыла, тут спойлер)🌺 ↯ #книжныезаметки_anya
💋3
𝓚расота тихого вечера 🩵 Отчего-то захотелось вспомнить арабские сказки, стала их слушать (не в хронологическом порядке, а как пойдёт) ) Синдбада любила в детстве, но помню плохо, как оказалось «Граф Монте-кристо» увлекает очень, но прочитала только половину 1 тома пока что
❤10
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bookdepth_undine_palace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 958,016 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒃𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒅𝒆𝒑𝒕𝒉 𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒆 ༄” (@bookdepth_undine_palace), 91 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookdepth_undine_palace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.