еще пару заставок уже для самого любимого стримера - follentass'а
👍5custom 52717211348893950483👎1

Channel
@boofi9
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
475subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001776832517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boofi9 |
| Description | credits: Азазин, BAZA(мориарти), Тимоха, Квантум, fasoollka, follentass, LUX |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boofi9 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 475 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 475 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 476 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
146 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5271721134889395048 | 43 | 29.5% | |
| custom 5319055531371930585 | 26 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5456320375459684681 | 25 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5456431688127094003 | 25 | 17.1% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 9.59% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 5.48% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.42% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
еще пару заставок уже для самого любимого стримера - follentass'а
👍5custom 52717211348893950483👎1
пару заставок на канал нарезок для одного из моих любимейших стримеров - Альмухана (MuhanJan) очень рад был попрактиковать риггинг в реальном заказе, все кайф
custom 54563203754596846817custom 54564316881270940035custom 52717211348893950483👎1
Шаурмичную короче открыть и норм будет
custom 54563203754596846816custom 54564316881270940033👎1custom 52717211348893950481
Сегодня сдал диплом на 98/100 Какие то странные ощущения вольной птицы (не считая возможный скорый отъезд в армейку) До конца еще не осознаю, но очень симпатизируют мысли что вместо ужасного подъема в 7 утра, езды на работу по 30 минут в -35, и в целом если буду без настроения - я смогу встать днем, заварить чайку и в свое удовольствие поделать заказики и мейби свои проекты Плюсом окончания учебы еще является что …
custom 52717211348893950487custom 53190555313719305855custom 54563203754596846812custom 54564316881270940032👎1
ура день дропа работка для братищке старика хинкалыча под продакшеном адеомы - https://t.me/adeomaadeoma/1300
custom 527172113488939504812custom 54563203754596846819custom 54564316881270940037❤1👎1
Недавно сделал спокойный+чилловый заказной промо ролик который предоставили monke saru продуктион подпишитесь на ребят, круто делают ну
❤5custom 54564316881270940034custom 52717211348893950483👎1
По 3 дольки в неделю буду растягивать теперь тварь эту Возможно даже как подарок на свадьбу оставлю кому нибудб половинку
custom 53190555313719305855❤2custom 54564316881270940032👎1
Ахуеете? Фистербелс настоящий, 1800 рублей отдал за 3 штуки Молочный - дефолт киндер не сильно сладкий (или бебифокс не сильно сладкмй) Ореховый - тоже дефолтная, но орехов много прекл С арахисовой пастой самый необычный, ультрамягкий был Своих денег точно не стоит, у вас че как дела? Работаете или как обычно
❤5custom 52717211348893950483custom 53190555313719305852👎1
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52717211348893950482custom 54564316881270940032custom 54563203754596846811
Очередные мною сделанные сценки из нового ролика на канале SCAMMERS. Работа интерсная, стилек тоже прикольный, думаю, что у меня получилось его реализовать. Посидев подумав, я прихожу к такому решению: если этот пост наберет достаточное по моему мнению количесво реакций, солью некоторые из этих проектов (а если реакций будет ну прям много для моего тгк, то вообще все солью)) Думаю, вам самим будет интересно покопат…
custom 531905553137193058510custom 52717211348893950487
Как и обещал, вот все эти проджекты. Еще раз всем спасибо за активчик, копайтесь в проектах, изучайте, мб кто то да что то новое для себя в них найдет. Не прощаемся, впереди еще больше крутых работ и проектов!
custom 53190555313719305854custom 52717211348893950482❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @boofi9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 729,569 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Буфи” (@boofi9), 475 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boofi9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.