Channel
@bonsoirregretademain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002683889438 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bonsoirregretademain |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bonsoirregretademain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 16 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 25 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 50.0% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 17.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.69% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Напишу пару слов про Victim of the Insane и больше таких постов не будет, думаю. https://youtu.be/XYqr1X-hViI Вообще, Trouble вместе с Candlemass и Saint Vitus замечательны тем, что на каком-то особом уровне прочувствовали страх, боль и отчаяние в песнях четырёх работяг из Бирмингема, усилили эти чувства до циклопических масштабов и бережно пронесли через глэмовские и панковские восьмидесятые. Выскажу спорное мнен…
❤2
В продолжение темы, мне нравится относительно недавний пост Джейкоба Бэннона (Converge, вы знаете) в своём Substack-блоге, где он кратко разбирает, что им двигало при написании текстов с Love Is Not Enough, побольше бы такого. https://jacobbannon.substack.com/p/love-is-not-enough-the-intention
❤1👎1😍1
Как можно заметить по нескольким постам выше, у меня есть некоторое пристрастие анализировать тексты, находить интерпретации и пробовать определить интеллектуальное и психоэмоциональное состояние автора в моменте творчества. Ну и наблюдать за собой, как я воспринимаю это сегодня и спустя некоторое время. Так вот, какое-то количество недель назад из подсознания всплыл очень недооцененный трек одной инструментальной г…
❤1👎1😍1
Ходил в субботу на концерт Пекинского велосипеда с кучей хороших групп на разгореве. Кроме прочего, понравилась группа нуна, мне они напомнили Cursive периода Domestica, с интересными вокальными ходами, местами походило на Дэрила Паламбо из Glassjaw почему-то. Немного жалко, конечно, что вкатился в группу только на их финальном концерте. Тоже запоздало, но оценил и Молочного поросёнка, которому не больно было ни ско…
💘5❤1😍1
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/YDY9OhHMOII
Огромный респект Авелине
👍4💩1
Немного с заделом на ближайшее будущее напишу сейчас про группу Cave In. Познакомил меня с ней очень хороший друг Вадим, когда я пытался играть на басу пост-метал с элементами прогрессива/сладжа/матрока и влиться в сибирскую музыкальную сцену. Хороший был 2019 год, лучший в моей жизни. Так вот, из кучи групп, подписанных на Deathwish Inc. и Hydra Head Records наибольший интерес у меня вызвала клика корешей из Conver…
❤2
В продолжение темы любимых произведений, сходил сегодня с друзьями на фильм Падение (The Fall в оригинале, в российском прокате -- "Запределье") 2006 года, и теперь это один из любимых моих фильмов! And he was falling from the train, and he was taking the car, and he was falling from... And he was falling from the bicycle and from a big house. He was falling from a rope and he was hit and he was going, "Mwah! Mwah! …
❤1🔥1
https://youtu.be/NTZUO3w6WQk
Текст получился смятым и заумным, но как наблюдение-напоминалка сойдёт.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bonsoirregretademain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bonsoir, regret, à demain” (@bonsoirregretademain), 16 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonsoirregretademain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.