Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for bonmatsu | bnm

Channel

bonmatsu | bnm

@bonmattsu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

136subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027776296
TypeChannel
Username@bonmattsu
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bonmattsu

Growth

135136135.59 August 2026 — 135 subscribers10 August 2026 — 135 subscribers17 August 2026 — 136 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:06136+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:54135no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:16135first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.0%
avg views ÷ 136 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total761
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53888422086967609706830.6%
custom 53212122663794942676027.0%
custom 52106912817008225355223.4%
custom 5467893671644908503177.66%
🥰167.21%
94.05%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC78 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

НАКОНЕЦ-ТО Я ДОДЕЛАЛА!!🥳 Оооочень давно хотела сделать клютиков под эту песню, потому что ну ОНИ. Ну и в принципе DEAD BLOND это Клубничка, меня не переубедить В планах есть еще одно видео с клютиками под песню от нее, но это уже мечты...🤩

custom 532121226637949426712custom 53888422086967609707custom 52106912817008225355

30 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC70 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vibro_shizaPhoto

Небольшой оффтоп, забрала брелочки от @bonmattsu Придурки помогают мне готовиться к экзамену И они потрясающие!!! Позже на днях ещё закину рисуночков, которые мне на днях подарили всякие крутые люди :р #offtop #panty_and_stocking

custom 521069128170082253510🥰5custom 53888422086967609705custom 54678936716449085031

29 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC66 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @nope89305Photo

Забрала брелоки, которые купила у @bonmattsu 🥰, и Ральзея с алика

custom 53888422086967609707🥰4custom 53212122663794942673

29 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC73 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наверное последняя атака в этом году... мда треш УЖЕ ИЮЛЬ ПРОШЕЛ

🥰6custom 52106912817008225356custom 53888422086967609705

27 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC75 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна месть. В том году хотела нарисовать какого-нибудь ОСа из УЦЦ, вот выпала возможность, так еще и мыша! 😊

custom 53888422086967609708custom 54678936716449085036custom 53212122663794942674custom 52106912817008225352

26 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC56 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sharbeosoPhoto

да нет у меня гиперфи- мои новые НЯШЕЧКИ ВКУСНЯШЕЧКИ 🌟 nsfw бонус в комментариях #hellphanage

custom 52106912817008225358custom 53212122663794942675custom 53888422086967609705

26 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC80 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мстя! Очень тяжело даются мне животные ОСОБЕННО С КРЫЛЬЯМИ

custom 52106912817008225359custom 53212122663794942677custom 53888422086967609702custom 54678936716449085032

25 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @aestheticofstarsVideo

Очередная мстя на артфайт🤩

custom 53212122663794942677custom 52106912817008225355

25 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC80 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 МАЙ НЬЮ ФРЕНД!!! 😊 Урестоки как по заказу 🤩

custom 538884220869676097015custom 54678936716449085038custom 53212122663794942677

20 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC103 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Атака! Решила порисовать трансформеров со своей соной мухехе Так же инфа для тех, кто заказывал брелки: Они приехали ко мне и уже в процессе упаковки. В ближайшее время всем отпишусь по поводу уточнения способа доставки, так же можете написать первыми в сообщения канала!

9custom 53212122663794942678custom 53888422086967609704

16 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC124 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вот и первая месть в этом году! 😊

custom 538884220869676097010custom 52106912817008225357custom 53212122663794942677🥰1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bonmattsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,404 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bonmatsu | bnm” (@bonmattsu), 136 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonmattsu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.