Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بدن رقصان

Channel

بدن رقصان

@bodyissues

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002053173650
TypeChannel
Username@bodyissues
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bodyissues

Growth

657660658.57 August 2026 — 660 subscribers8 August 2026 — 660 subscribers8 August 2026 — 659 subscribers15 August 2026 — 658 subscribers28 August 2026 — 657 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 657–660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 01:14657-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:18658-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:24659-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:35660no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:35660first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.96%
avg views ÷ 657 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (20 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total26
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 42s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7185.5%
👍1012.0%
🔥22.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📽 نقد و بررسی سریال «گل سنگ» - پارت دوم 🌒 محمدجواد فراهانی و شادی موسوی @bodyissues 📰 مجله تصویری فیلم‌آرا لینک نسخه کامل در آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/v/imzb19j

4

31 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC149 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📰 شمارهٔ ۲۸ مجله «فیلم کاو» با محوریت «یوفوریا» در فیدیبو منتشر شد. ✍ در این شماره، نقد من با این عنوان منتشر شده: «رنجِ خوش‌عکس» از تنِ نافرمان تا بدنِ تماشایی: مرلوپونتی، سوزان بوردو و بدن‌هایی که زیر نور نئون می‌درخشند تا بهتر مصرف شوند. در این مقاله، «یوفوریا» را از منظر بدنمندی، تجربهٔ زیسته، هویت، تروما و نگاه بررسی کرده‌ام. اینکه چگونه بدن در این سریال به میدان کشمکش میان میل، قدرت و سازوکارهای فرهنگی تبدیل

11👍2

29 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC352 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✍ بعد از ماه‌ها پژوهش، بازنویسی، داوری و اصلاح، مقاله‌ام در فصلنامه «پژوهش هنر» منتشر شد. @bodyissues 🌒 در این پژوهش با تکیه بر آرای دانا هاراوی، اندیشه‌های میشل فوکو و ژان بودریار، بازنمایی بدن سایبرگ در چهار فیلم THX 1138، The Machine، Ex Machina و The Creator را بررسی کرده‌ام؛ اینکه چگونه بدن سایبرگ از ابژه‌ای تحت سلطه به سوژه‌ای دارای عاملیت، مقاومت و امکان بازتعریف هویت بدل می‌شود. 🔗لینک دریافت مقاله: https://p

10

29 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📽 نقد و بررسی سریال «گل سنگ» 🌒 محمدجواد فراهانی و شادی موسوی @bodyissues 📰 مجله تصویری فیلم‌آرا لینک نسخه کامل در آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/v/imzb19j

7👍1

17 Jul 2026, 21:54 UTC304 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jostarhayehonariPhoto

فصلنامه جستارهای هنری با همکاری موسسه فرهنگی هنری خانواده هنر اردیبهشت برگزار می‏کند: وبینار" امر ناتمام در هنر" (The Unfinished in Art) با حضور: دکتر سعید هنرمند مژده صالحی شهرام احمدزاده مینا سالاری نهند علیرضا جدیدالاسلامی دکتر فریماه فاطمی شادی موسوی دکتر ملیحه مقصودی زهرا کملاخ دکتر فاطمه خدادادی آق قلعه دکتر علی روئین زمان: پنجشنبه یکم امرداد 1405، از 17 تا 19:30 (به وقت تهران) در گوگل میت به نشانی: https://m

6👍3

6 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC425 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💫 حرکت، رقص و تمرین‌های آگاهی بدنی قرار نیست بدن را اصلاح کنند. آنها می‌توانند کمک کنند دوباره با بدن ارتباط برقرار کنیم، از نگاه قضاوت‌گر فاصله بگیریم و آن را به‌عنوان بخشی زنده از تجربه‌ی خودمان بشناسیم. اگر دوست دارید این تجربه را به‌صورت عملی هم امتحان کنید، ثبت‌نام دوره‌ی جدید حرکت و آگاهی بدنی همچنان باز است و خوشحال می‌شویم در کلاس همراهتان باشیم.🌿 Videography & director: @rodi_images @bodyissues Telegram: @sh

8

28 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC472 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📰 شماره‌ی پنجم مجله‌ی عکاسی «ببین» با موضوع «بدن، فرم و وضعیت» منتشر شد. ✍ در این شماره افتخار داشتم به‌عنوان نویسنده و تحلیل‌گر، خوانشی فرمالیستی، پدیدارشناسانه و روان‌پویانه از ۲۰ عکس منتخب ارائه دهم؛ تحلیل‌هایی که می‌کوشند بدن را به‌مثابه بستری برای شکل‌گیری معنا، تجربه و ادراک بررسی کنند. این شماره حاصل همراهی عکاسان بسیاری است که هر یک روایت خود را از بدن، وضعیت و تجربه‌ی زیسته‌ی آن در جهان امروز به تصویر کشیده

13🔥2

20 Jun 2026, 17:28 UTC494 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌒 آیا هر دردی یک معنای پنهان دارد؟ این روزها در شبکه‌های اجتماعی با فهرست‌هایی مواجه می‌شویم که برای هر درد جسمی، یک معنای روانیِ قطعی تعیین می‌کنند؛ از «ترس در کمر» تا «خشم در فک» و «پول در لگن». اما آیا علم واقعاً چنین چیزی را تأیید می‌کند؟ ارتباط ذهن و بدن واقعی است، اما نه به شکل یک فرهنگ لغت ساده. استرس، هیجان‌ها و تجربه‌های زندگی می‌توانند بر بدن اثر بگذارند اما این اثرات در هر فرد متفاوت‌اند و به عوامل متعدد

12👍4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bodyissues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بدن رقصان” (@bodyissues), 657 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bodyissues.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.