#网友投稿:U也不安全了 最近泰达公司疯狂冻结地址? 最近闲来无事,打开Tokenview看了看,发现最近几个月泰达公司在疯狂冻usdt. 最近几个月冻结的地址比这几年加起来都多,这不最近一个星期的,冻结了好几个几百万u的地址。 PS:别慌 冻结的基本上都是洗钱 盗U的 反正就是异常的账户
❤2

Channel
@bodu3800
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002286577619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bodu3800 |
| Description | 博彩行业最新资讯推送,境外新闻安危大事件,纯粹关注民生/政策动向。 海外同胞遇难华人同胞如遇困难,有需求曝光,请联系爆料专员 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 11 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bodu3800 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 133 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 77 | 59.7% | |
| 🤬 | 26 | 20.2% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 7.75% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 7 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿:U也不安全了 最近泰达公司疯狂冻结地址? 最近闲来无事,打开Tokenview看了看,发现最近几个月泰达公司在疯狂冻usdt. 最近几个月冻结的地址比这几年加起来都多,这不最近一个星期的,冻结了好几个几百万u的地址。 PS:别慌 冻结的基本上都是洗钱 盗U的 反正就是异常的账户
❤2
#网友投稿:U也不安全了 最近泰达公司疯狂冻结地址? 最近闲来无事,打开Tokenview看了看,发现最近几个月泰达公司在疯狂冻usdt. 最近几个月冻结的地址比这几年加起来都多,这不最近一个星期的,冻结了好几个几百万u的地址。 PS:别慌 冻结的基本上都是洗钱 盗U的 反正就是异常的账户
关于境外劝返最后通牒,全国33682人将面临取消国籍。
❤2👎1
🔆#泰国资讯 (2024年07月19日)周五 曼谷酒店毒杀案|这家酒店很邪门,毒杀案前曾频繁出事! 导读:泰国曼谷四面神君悦酒店在7月16日发生毒杀案,造成6死惨剧。有网友随后找出了这家酒店的历史,发现事故频发,令人毛骨悚然。据悉,一位在小红书上,帐号为“无名氏”的网友,7月17日凌晨在小红书上,列出这家酒店的肇事历史,结果发现这家酒店,在1950年前施工建设期间,就曾发生多次事故,甚至是死亡事件,因而被认为不吉,直至建立四面佛神坛后,这些不幸的事件,才跟着平息。然而来到2006年,一名男子不知何故,... https://www.bodu365.co/a/176215.html
#群友投稿:刚刚金三角品荣物业被抓了一个公司,又带走了一批人。 PS:今天什么情况 突击抓捕好几个地方 我帅比竟然没有收到通知,这大巴车狗推看了都要射射发抖。
关于境外劝返最后通牒,全国33682人将面临取消国籍。
💩77🤬26🤮10🤡6❤2
#网友投稿 今天佤邦又送了一批国际电信金融专家回国 回家啦😳😳😳
针对同胞的绑架案: 背后的原因或许“不太单纯 近日,又有3名中国人在金边的菩森芷区被柬埔寨警方逮捕,原因是他们3人涉嫌伙同其他9名同伙,绑架并勒索另外2名中国人6万美金。 至于他们为何要铤而走险、跟法律“打擂台”的原因,目前柬埔寨警方也还在调查之中。然而,这也并不是过去一两年起发生的首起“中国人绑架中国人”恶性案件: 2023年3月,时任西港警察局长、现任金边市警察局长的尊那林通报,3名中国男子涉嫌绑架1名中国同胞被西港警方逮捕; 2023年4月,西港警方在一家赌场内逮捕了2名中国人,罪名是他们涉嫌绑架6名中国同胞; 2023年11月,2名涉嫌绑架同胞,并勒索6400美金的中国人被金边市初级法院判刑入狱; 纵观以上案件就会发现,这些发生在中国同胞身上的绑架案背后都有一个共同点:那就是加害人和受害者全都是中国人,而且还涉及不同金额的勒索行为。 时不时发生的绑架案件除了让受害人在身心方面严重受损,也带来了其它方面的“次…
#邱伟安 福建漳州漳浦县人,最开始起家的时候是在佤邦邦康新锐公寓,做微交易诈骗了几个亿人民币,后面到大其立,金星里面的瑞兴园区,一直从事绑架贩卖人口。 本人表弟跟他朋友从去年十一月份失联到现在,现在我就想问公司负责人,我表弟人是死是活 请给一个准确的答复,如果人还在,赔付多少家里面会打钱,请把人放了 如果被你们卖掉,请告知卖到那个公司。 因为我表弟是跟着我一个结拜兄弟出去的。 现在他爸妈天天来我家闹,以为是我介绍出去的。如果没有得到你们准确回复,我就当他死了,我会对你的家人开始不顾一切的报复。 你家我们也去找了,老家确实没有人 你姐在厦门,她的微信我也加过她了,她觉得中国法治社会能保护她,不搭理我 ,她店在哪里,住哪里我全部叫人跟踪查的清清楚楚,如果这件事情得不到解决不好意思,凭我在当地那些精神小伙心中地位,我叫他们去缅甸柬埔寨 他们肯定不敢 我叫他去砍人 他们绝对敢。 明天没有得到满意回复我会告诉他们,他们儿子被你打死…
❤1
原名,苏恩.苏打,女 ,一名翻译,飞机名叫soda,1997-5月-12日,柬埔寨傍士省的人,离婚有3个孩子,2个孩子跟美国一个加州人生的56岁,另外最小的一个孩子跟一个黑人生的,在FB上认识很多没见过面的人,转过很多钱给她。 2023年,一次偶然认识她了,开始我什么都不知道,然后开始骗我的钱,骗我跟她订婚,给她亲戚钱,当时花了几千美金,订婚时候她侄子头摔破了然后骗我去医院献血,当时她说手机坏了,我马上给买个手机,被她孩子摔坏了,没手机用,把我们订婚戒指卖掉去买了手机,我当时心都凉了。 总是问我借钱说下个月还给你,至今没有还过一分钱,吵架骂人跟本人完全是两种人,非常狠毒的,希望不要中招,一次偶然怀孕流产花医药费就是2000$+,前后花掉4000$ 现在又在西哈努克找了一个翻译工作,大家注意了!
吹嘘“公司花23万亿美元已买下故宫博物院”,上万人被骗!江西警方破获跨省养老诈骗案 买入代持股只赚不赔,拉亲朋好友参与投资。还能获得额外奖励,看似“稳赚不赔”的投资,最后却让投资人血本无归。 近日,江西省广昌县公安局成功破获一起跨省养老诈骗案,办案民警经过长达4个月的苦心经营,日夜兼程横跨5省,行程达3000多公里,冻结涉案账户97个,冻结涉案总金额4000余万元,涉案人数高达上万人。 据办案民警介绍,该诈骗团伙对外宣称其公司已于2019年在美国上市并且花23万亿美元购买了故宫博物院,以“实现中国梦”为口号,捏造其公司获得国家背景支持的政策,是由国家兜底而成立的世界银行(全世界人民的银行,但必须由中国人控股),并称该银行存在的目的就是让穷人富起来。 该团伙同时声称,现在公司开通绿色通道,只需要投资人投入1万元,等待公司上市后,将获得价值 1000万元的购物卡;投入3万元,可以得到价值 1亿元的购物卡。并且此购物卡是“国家…
❤1
泰国向电诈宣战!或将打击电信诈骗列入国家议程! 3月11日上午,在泰国上议院议会会议上,上议院议员向泰国数字经济和社会部(DES)部长巴瑟提出了关于泰国民众遭受电信诈骗危害的问题,包括政府打击措施、民众了解程度以及是否将此事列为国家议程等方面的疑问。 巴瑟表示,他承认目前电信诈骗问题日益严重,不法分子利用社交网络给民众造成危害。因此,DES部门与其他多个部门机构进行了联合合作,尤其是与泰国国家警察总署和泰国中央银行,以严格查封非法账户及其他可疑账户。 同时,泰国反洗钱委员会将对非法团伙资金路线进行调查和扣押。泰国证券交易所(SET)也将开设投资诈骗举报热线,泰国司法部特案厅(DSI)也与DES保持密切合作,包括对单日超过100次通话的可疑电话号码进行调查。 巴瑟进一步表示,DES部门设立了1441反网络犯罪中心(AOC),可全天24小时为民众提供服务,目前日均服务量超过3,000条。 此外,政府还发布了相关法案,规定受…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bodu3800. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博度-新闻大事件” (@bodu3800), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bodu3800.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.