2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 618–620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 10:17
619
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:47
619
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
445
Videos
263
Links
88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
598 reactions across 14 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
147
24.6%
😱
82
13.7%
👍
73
12.2%
😍
36
6.02%
🔥
34
5.69%
🥰
29
4.85%
🍓
22
3.68%
🐳
21
3.51%
💋
21
3.51%
❤🔥
16
2.68%
😁
15
2.51%
🍾
14
2.34%
💯
14
2.34%
😈
11
1.84%
👌
9
1.51%
👏
7
1.17%
😢
7
1.17%
🤝
7
1.17%
🤡
7
1.17%
🤣
6
1.00%
9 further kinds
20
3.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bobrboy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 27 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
346LOZZZY теперь мой партнер по тиктоку, а вы теперь, пожалуйста, любимые подписчики ещё и в тиктоке💞 (тип подписаться надо)
Ща я придумаю как максимально весело вас заинтриговать на вашу активность там (что то про бабки💰)
P.S. просто сплю пока ещё, проснулся чтобы постик сделать
Увидимся🥰
Честно, принимать поздравления просто потому что у тебя писька между ног — ну такое, смешно даже😂
У меня бабушка погоны носила — вот это рили защитник отечества 🫡
А если ты ни присягу не давал, ни срочку не служил — почему ты вообще к этому празднику причастен??)?)
Ещё в команду себе ищу:
1. Монтажеров (резать готовые видосики у нас времени не хватает азазаза)
2. Битмейкеров (ладно, ваш войстег в бите обсудим)
3. Хэлпер на съемочной площадке (просто ходишь, контролируешь, помогаешь и монетка сыпется)
По деньгам не обидим, все обсуждается: @bb_mngt
Так же хотим кого-нибудь из вас выдернуть на стрим как участника, как думаете, имеет смысл?
Крч пришла идея в голову, хотите конкурс?
Отдадим час vr игр бесплатно на футбольном поле (адекватное блятб, без проводов этих над головой ебучих) и отдадим на час футбольное поле для игры в футбол на футбольном поле 🗿
И еще всяких приколюх
И пацанам мяч у нас погонять норм и девчонкам как будто тоже может быть интересно 🫡
На каникулах как будто компанией сгонять прикольно будет🥸
Киньте реакций много пэж, если сд…
Забрал подарочки на НГ🥰
С Наступающим! 🎉
Мы снова радуемся снегу за окном и оповещаем всех об этом в своих соцсетях ❄️
Итоги года? Мы снова ничего толкового не сделали. 💀
Ощущение праздника? Фейк. 🤥
Мы прожили ещё год, а мир даже не заметил. 🕐
Новогоднее настроение? По-моему мы тут уже все слишком взрослые для этого. 🥂
Мы продолжаем ждать «лучшего момента», которого не будет.
Мы делаем вид, что живём.
На самом…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bobrboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 468,506 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bobrboy” (@bobrboy), 619 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bobrboy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.