Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@bnbea
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
985subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001746331783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bnbea |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bnbea |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 985 | -8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 993 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:54 | 995 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:34 | 1,000 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 1,001 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,003 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,008 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 1,009 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 1,011 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,014 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 1,016 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,017 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 1,017 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 20 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 6 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Sorry guys, did not update so consistently this few weeks. Been so busy with our Finchleap second investment project
No one can predict the market 100% even the bots
Finchleap is a investment company, we don't gamble. So, don't try to gamble your whole savings with this. We can make sure there's profits but we're handling it slow and steady, there's no such thing as per day 50%-100% profits. Take your own risk and let's profit together!
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Our bot is still running at it's best!
Sorry guys, took a medical leave for few days
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Hi, how do we join?? In order to join our portfolio automatically, you only need to follow 3 steps 1. You can join our partnered broker here https://portal.fortuneprime.com/getview?view=register&token=8tbzowwwe9owwwww 2. Verify your account and add funds. 3. Then click here to join our PAMM - Finchleap Growth https://pamm.fortuneprime.com/app/join/5/hefmiijq
A lot of you have been asking me 👋 "What broker did Finchleap used?, is it safe to invest?" Broker that we used called Fortune Prime Global(FPG), totally safe to invest your money in it, Finchleap been using it since 2020 without any fraud happen but sometimes slow withdrawal might happen due to time difference. Why FPG? 1. ASIC regulated (Australia) 2. 30+ years in market 3. Trustpilot with 4.3 4. 1+ Million trad…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bnbea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
FOMC news
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 6 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Finchleap” (@bnbea), 985 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bnbea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.