白马庄园助力红包火爆来袭 🤓每天加拿大封盘时间(北京时间19:00) ,VIP群组发送128个红包,领取的红包乘以昨日流水倍率进行派送礼金,彩金送至极速骰子、电子游戏、 高倍扫雷 彩金三倍流水下分 💎流水2888以上领取红包金额乘以18倍 💎流水6888以上领取红包金额乘以38倍 💎流水20888以上领取红包金额乘以58倍 💎流水68888以上领取红包金额乘以158倍 活动规则: 💸以昨天0点到晚上12点一整天单个游戏的流水计算,流水需满足当天充值金额的三倍以上才可领取 💸追加奖励:满足活动规则条件下,抢到红包金额为顺子,例如 0.12、2.34 、3.21 、2.10 时,奖励再乘3倍,抢到红包金额为豹子,例如 1.11、2.22,奖励翻6倍。 ———————-——-——-——-——-——- ⚠️超满赔2.0/超满赔2.7以及骰子游戏赔率皆封顶,不能参与此活动! ⚠️单个玩家单个账号每天仅限领取一次奖励,以上活动仅限真

Channel
白马庄园中转频道
@bmzypd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
242subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004436995916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bmzypd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bmzypd |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 242 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 234 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 234 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.2%
- avg views ÷ 242 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.4
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 835 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 1s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🌸 浪漫七夕 · 情定白马 🌸 银河为证,鹊桥相会 这个七夕,把浪漫留给最重要的人 ❤️ 🌙 月下相约,花前相伴 💞 愿有岁月可回首,且以深情共白头 ✨ 所念皆如愿,所爱皆相伴 白马庄园祝大家: 七夕快乐,甜蜜常伴,幸福长久! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️白马庄园上下分群 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
#白马pc #爆奖 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 白马庄园【pc2.8】热点战报 😆恭喜ID😆【*****750】老板😶 第 3471460 期喜中数字玩法【27】 投注金额:【5】 U 中奖【958】 倍 ,喜得中奖金额 【4790】U 白马庄园【pc2.0】热点战报 😆恭喜ID😆【*****703】老板😶 第 3471460 期喜中数字玩法【27】 投注金额:【5】 U 中奖【888】 倍 ,喜得中奖金额 【4440】U 白马庄园【pc 满赔】热点战报 😆恭喜ID😆【*****750】老板😶 第 3471460 期喜中数字玩法【27】 投注金额:【7】 U 中奖【920】 倍 ,喜得中奖金额 【6440】U 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
#币圈新闻 MAYAChain遭攻击损失约170万美元,网络紧急暂停 跨链去中心化交易所 Maya Protocol 遭攻击后暂停网络运行,初步估计损失约 170万美元。 Maya Protocol 联合创始人 Aalux 表示,攻击者窃取约 **20枚比特币(约140万美元)**及30万美元其他资产,项目方已实施全球暂停以控制损失,并着手修复网络。 初步技术分析显示,此次攻击涉及6个相互关联的软件漏洞。攻击者通过一笔包含23条消息的交易,操纵流动性池计算,并从 Maya 的 Asgard 模块中盗取约 4887万枚 CACAO。 事件发生后,CACAO价格从约 0.115美元暴跌至0.013美元,跌幅达88.7%。约136万美元资产被转移至外部区块链,攻击者在 MAYAChain 上仍持有约29.1万美元的 CACAO及相关交易头寸。 需要注意的是,资金池价值估计减少约 1090万美元,其中包含 CACAO 贬值及套利…
#白马pc #爆奖 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 白马庄园【pc2.8】热点战报 😆恭喜ID😆【*****355】老板😶 第 3471346期喜中数字玩法【27】 投注金额:【500】 U 中奖【958】 倍 ,喜得中奖金额 【479000】U 白马庄园【pc超满】热点战报 😆恭喜ID😆【*****541】老板😶 第 3471346期喜中数字玩法【27】 投注金额:【200】 U 中奖【1000】 倍 ,喜得中奖金额 【200000】U 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
#白马庄园 #走势 😂🔴🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 🔴🥰🥰🥰🥰😂 😂尊敬老板们 白马庄园 欢迎您的光临🧐 😝搏一搏,单车变摩托,赌一赌,摩托变路虎。 💵财富是勇敢者的游戏,永远不要害怕下注。 😋在追寻财富的路上,敢于冒险,人生才有輝煌。😋 😋梭哈一把,愿您的勇气能换来梦想的实现💰
白马庄园助力红包火爆来袭 🤓每天加拿大封盘时间(北京时间19:00) ,VIP群组发送128个红包,领取的红包乘以昨日流水倍率进行派送礼金,彩金送至极速骰子、电子游戏、 高倍扫雷 彩金三倍流水下分 💎流水2888以上领取红包金额乘以18倍 💎流水6888以上领取红包金额乘以38倍 💎流水20888以上领取红包金额乘以58倍 💎流水68888以上领取红包金额乘以158倍 活动规则: 💸以昨天0点到晚上12点一整天单个游戏的流水计算,流水需满足当天充值金额的三倍以上才可领取 💸追加奖励:满足活动规则条件下,抢到红包金额为顺子,例如 0.12、2.34 、3.21 、2.10 时,奖励再乘3倍,抢到红包金额为豹子,例如 1.11、2.22,奖励翻6倍。 ———————-——-——-——-——-——- ⚠️超满赔2.0/超满赔2.7以及骰子游戏赔率皆封顶,不能参与此活动! ⚠️单个玩家单个账号每天仅限领取一次奖励,以上活动仅限真
#白马庄园 #走势 #PC 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 pc大长龙,有梦您就来! 🤩 要想富,下重注🤩 白马一分钟,少打十年工 别把最好的机遇浪费 在无谓的等待与犹豫不决中! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
#国际新闻 黑产豪掷700万美元买过期域名,赌球网站暗藏木马 安全公司Infoblox发现,名为Sable Squirrel的黑产团伙控制超过1万个域名,估计花费逾700万美元收购具有历史流量和搜索信誉的过期域名。 这些域名表面提供体育直播和博彩服务,部分同时充当远控木马及勒索软件的控制服务器,已有超过3.1万个恶意程序样本与其关联。
😀😀😀😀😀逢8必发活动 😀即日起每个月的8号,18号,28号只要您在白马庄园有充值流水,根据相应流水条件您都有3次抽取好运红包的机会,更有机会领取喜上加喜特殊奖励!(红包抽奖时间为:每月逢8当天北京时间下午14:00准时在白马庄园vip群内发红包抽奖,红包金额888U, 数量按照在线人数来定。) 😀活动流水计算周期为:每月1-7号的流水8号抽奖,8-17号的流水18号抽奖,18到27号的流水28号抽奖,需活动期间在白马庄园单个游戏流水达到总充值金额的三倍以上,并在抽奖当天抢到vip群活动红包,满足以下流水要求方可领取 😀单个游戏流水达到 😀领取 😀1万U以上 😮💨 😀😀1️⃣ 😀3万U以上 😮💨 😀😀1️⃣ 😀6万U以上 😮💨 😀😀😀1️⃣ 😀18万以上 😮💨 😀😀😀1️⃣ 😀50万U以上 😮…
#马来西亚新闻 #谨慎 防骗 女医生77次转账被骗55.8万令吉,退休人员想借1万反被骗9万多 马来西亚登嘉楼一天披露两起网络诈骗案,一名32岁私人诊所女医生被骗55.8万令吉,另一名60岁退休人员原本只想申请1万令吉贷款,最后反被骗走92,781令吉。 今年初,龙运一名32岁女医生在Instagram看到网络交易和投资课程广告后与对方联系,随后又通过WhatsApp与一名叫“Wan”的人员沟通。对方先让她支付300令吉购买交易技巧教学视频,之后不断要求她转账投资。 从1月12日至8月11日,女医生先后向6个银行账户转账77次,总金额达到55.8万令吉,但一直没有拿到任何投资回报。之后对方又要求她继续支付所谓“赔偿金”,并以采取法律行动相威胁。女医生这才发现被骗并报警。 同一天,瓜拉登嘉楼警方也披露另一起网络贷款骗局。一名60岁退休人员今年6月在Facebook看到低利息贷款广告,因为需要1万令吉作个人用途,便通过Wh…
白马庄园助力红包火爆来袭 🤓每天加拿大封盘时间(北京时间19:00) ,VIP群组发送128个红包,领取的红包乘以昨日流水倍率进行派送礼金,彩金送至极速骰子、电子游戏、 高倍扫雷 彩金三倍流水下分 💎流水2888以上领取红包金额乘以18倍 💎流水6888以上领取红包金额乘以38倍 💎流水20888以上领取红包金额乘以58倍 💎流水68888以上领取红包金额乘以158倍 活动规则: 💸以昨天0点到晚上12点一整天单个游戏的流水计算,流水需满足当天充值金额的三倍以上才可领取 💸追加奖励:满足活动规则条件下,抢到红包金额为顺子,例如 0.12、2.34 、3.21 、2.10 时,奖励再乘3倍,抢到红包金额为豹子,例如 1.11、2.22,奖励翻6倍。 ———————-——-——-——-——-——- ⚠️超满赔2.0/超满赔2.7以及骰子游戏赔率皆封顶,不能参与此活动! ⚠️单个玩家单个账号每天仅限领取一次奖励,以上活动仅限真
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bmzypd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 506,645 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bmzypd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“白马庄园中转频道” (@bmzypd), 242 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bmzypd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.