🌊🌊🌊 🇯🇵🇯🇵 🌊🌊🌊🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 ༉‧₊˚. 𝑑𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑤𝑒'𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟? ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ 🧊 Ph.
custom 536392351711496965114❤10custom 53098009935405563229💘6custom 52111964256893877674🐳1custom 54651818078193804571

Channel
@bmaelv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002201361190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bmaelv |
| Description | Меня зовут Ия. Рада приветствовать 😌 Лайф тгк/щп: https://t.me/bmaelv41 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bmaelv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 219 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 219 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (16 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,046 |
| Reactions total | 512 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
512 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5240101160454486662 | 97 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5211196425689387767 | 59 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5363923517114969651 | 52 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5465181807819380457 | 48 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5442907403047694783 | 43 | 8.40% | |
| custom 5221991834577823658 | 39 | 7.62% | |
| custom 5309800993540556322 | 32 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5242616662670207826 | 30 | 5.86% | |
| 💘 | 29 | 5.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 2.73% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 1.56% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.195% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 512reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌊🌊🌊 🇯🇵🇯🇵 🌊🌊🌊🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 ༉‧₊˚. 𝑑𝑜 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑤𝑒'𝑙𝑙 𝑏𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟? ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ 🧊 Ph.
custom 536392351711496965114❤10custom 53098009935405563229💘6custom 52111964256893877674🐳1custom 54651818078193804571
Сегодня снимали красоту с Праленой на Камчатке 🤍 Так хотелось снять всего побольше, что я совсем забыла про тгк… Глупые кружочки с путешествия можно глянуть в щп. Ну а здесь оставляю видео на память
custom 524261666267020782613custom 52111964256893877678custom 53639235171149696516❤5
🤩Аникон🤩 Кажется, если бы ребята не потащили меня фоткаться, то фото с аникона у меня были бы только со сцены ❄️ Медуза Ph.
custom 524010116045448666219custom 522199183457782365811custom 521119642568938776710custom 54651818078193804572❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12custom 52111964256893877677custom 52401011604544866625custom 52426166626702078262custom 53639235171149696512
Не без фото с Аникона💥 💫 Блэр 💫 Медуза Ph.
custom 546518180781938045718custom 521119642568938776716custom 522199183457782365812❤6
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 💗 Ph.
custom 524010116045448666227custom 544290740304769478317custom 546518180781938045713
🐾Ренеша 🐾 Снимала фото на заявку, решила доснимать в Рене
💘23custom 524010116045448666218custom 544290740304769478314❤3custom 54651818078193804571
Аникон 2026 Номинация "Гранд дефиле" Косбенд "Пир Духа" 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 А вот и видео с нашего выступления! 😀 Желаем вам приятного просмотра! Отдельная благодарность всем, кто смотрел нас в прямом эфире или в зале! Ваша поддержка и реакции — лучшая награда! ❤ ✨ Соул Мака Блэк Стар Цубаки Кид Пати Лиз ✨ Шинигами Штейн Мария Джастин Спирит ✨ Медуза Хрона Эрука Фри Мизуне ✨ Кишин Арахна Блэр ✨ Мифуне Анджела ✨ Эскал…
custom 524010116045448666212custom 52219918345778236588custom 52111964256893877677❤2
Это было вчера, но сейчас я уже дома 🥺 ☀️ Мака 🌙 Медуза Ph.
custom 524010116045448666211🕊8custom 52426166626702078267❤3custom 53098009935405563223
Вот и завершился наш гранд, а всё завершается только хорошим 🤍 И это выступление получилось как нельзя лучше. Большое спасибо ребятам, за эту возможность, их труд и время, проведённое вместе 💕 Первый день Аникона пролетел незаметно. Я уже даже забыла, какими насыщенными бывают фестивали. Приходит время готовиться к следующему
❤13custom 530980099354055632213custom 52219918345778236587custom 54429074030476947833custom 54651818078193804571
«Пир Духа» всё! 😀 Вот и прошло наше выступление! Сегодняшний день был очень тяжелым, но эмоции, полученные на сцене и отзывы смотрящих стоили каждого испытания! Спасибо всем, кто смотрел и говорил нашей команде приятные слова ❤️ Лично для меня, это было исполнением детской мечты. Всю жизнь ты живешь любимым фэндомом, а потом собираешь команду из чудесных людей, долго и упорно трудишься, а потом получаешь овации из …
custom 54651818078193804579custom 52111964256893877676custom 53639235171149696514custom 52219918345778236581
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52426166626702078268custom 53639235171149696518custom 53098009935405563225❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bmaelv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 94,409 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bmaelv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ия, это ты?” (@bmaelv), 219 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bmaelv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.