🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖🤍🤍 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓬𝓱 7𝓽𝓱 🤩 𝓹𝓱𝓸𝓽𝓸/𝓻𝓽 Иногда кажется, что мое сознание - сплошной лабиринт, и я хожу в нем кругами. Кажется, я начинаю сходить с ума. 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹 🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Рт/ 🤩🤩🤩🤩реакции!😎
💋4❤3🔥2
Signed мда [🎣🪩]

Channel
@blya_lin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001688040459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blya_lin |
| Description | god let me live another day and i'm gonna make it everyone's problem анонка - http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=yve5zg99p2gm2 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blya_lin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 53 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 53 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
205 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 101 | 49.3% | |
| ❤ | 62 | 30.2% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 11.7% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 4.39% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 3.41% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 0.976% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blya_lin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖🤍🤍 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓬𝓱 7𝓽𝓱 🤩 𝓹𝓱𝓸𝓽𝓸/𝓻𝓽 Иногда кажется, что мое сознание - сплошной лабиринт, и я хожу в нем кругами. Кажется, я начинаю сходить с ума. 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹 🤩🤩🤩 🥹🥹 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Рт/ 🤩🤩🤩🤩реакции!😎
💋4❤3🔥2
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
😀😀😀😀 🦷🦷 🦷🦷🦷 😀😀😀😀 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍➖➖➖ 😀😀😀😀 🦷🥹🥹 🦷🦷 😀😀😀😀 🦷🥹🥹🥹 😀😀😀😀 Бог полюбил птиц и создал деревья. 😀😀😀😀 Человек полюбил птиц и создал клетки. 𝓜𝓪r𝓬𝓱 7𝓽𝓱 🥹🥹 🎀🦷 🦷 🥹 𝓹𝓱𝓸𝓽𝓸/𝓻𝓽 🦷 🦷 🦷🦷 Рт/реакции!🥹
❤8💋2🥰2💘1
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
I'll take a potato chip... AND EAT IT ⋆₊°light .˚L 。‧misora₊˚. fd death note ph
❤15💋9💘6
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 🦷 🦷 🤩🤩🤩𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡. 🦷 🦷 🦷 🦷 🦷 🥹🥹 🤩𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝟽𝑡ℎ😁 𝙼𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝙸 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚢𝚘𝚞. 𝚂𝚊𝚢𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚎. 𝙲𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗? 𝙲𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏? 𝙲𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞? 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎? 𝙳𝚘 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝
💋7❤1🔥1
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
𝕴'𝖒 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖔𝖓𝖊 𝖙𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖑 𝖇𝖊𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖊 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖌𝖔𝖉 𝖔𝖋 𝖆 𝖓𝖊𝖜 𝖜𝖔𝖗𝖑𝖉 𝖙𝖍𝖆𝖙 𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖞 𝖔𝖓𝖊 𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖘! ⋆♱ light ⋆ L ⋆ misa ♱⋆ fd death note ph
💋13🔥8❤7
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
Photo, posted without a caption
💋11❤5
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓭𝓮𝓮𝓹 𝓲𝓼 𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓵𝓸𝓿𝓮𓏲ּ𝄢 ch aki x angel fd chainsaw man
💋14❤8🔥1
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😀😀 🤍 😀😀 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🆔🤍🤍🤩 🪼🪼 𝚈𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚔𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚏𝚒𝚡𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝚈𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐. 😀 𝓔𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🥀 🤩 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓬𝓱 7𝓽𝓱 𝓹𝓱𝓸𝓽𝓸/𝓻𝓽 🎀 Рт/реакции!
💋9🥰3🔥2
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
сегодня фотографировала красивых розововолосых девушек в количестве 2 шт. март 7 темень
💋10❤6🎄2
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
࣪𓏲ּ ᥫ᭡ ₊ ⊹ ˑ ִֶ 𓂃when the time comes, make a choice you won't regret, trailblazer⭑ ch kafka fd honkai star rail ph jane
💋15❤6🥰4
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
Не бывает безвыходных ситуаций… Тебе просто нужно умереть раньше, чем они тебя убьют 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩➖➖ 🤍Misa🤩🤩Light🍎 🤍Ph🤩 🤍Реакции!!!🍎🪽
🔥10💋7❤3
Signed мда [🎣🪩]
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @blya_lin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 821,524 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“форелька что-то делает” (@blya_lin), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blya_lin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.