Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مَا وَراءَ النَّفسْ 👥

Channel

مَا وَراءَ النَّفسْ 👥

@bluepsychology5

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,878subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002061436573
TypeChannel
Username@bluepsychology5
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bluepsychology5

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8711,8791,87530 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,878 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,879 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,873 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,871 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,878 subscribers1,87830 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,870–1,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:381,878+7
12 Sept 2026, 00:411,871-2
8 Sept 2026, 01:371,873-6
2 Sept 2026, 15:071,879+1
30 Aug 2026, 21:091,878+1
30 Aug 2026, 12:301,877first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.94%
avg views ÷ 1,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 March 202630 August 2026)
Views total73
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7680.0%
😢77.37%
💯55.26%
🔥55.26%
👏11.05%
💘11.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

النص يشبه فكرة طرحها كتاب الحرية الفكرية ( ما يغلق من غير أن يُعالج يجد طريقة للظهور في أشكال أخرى ... نزاعات،علاقات،اضطرابات نفسية، ضياع ) الكبت والإنكار حيل دفاعية يستخدمها عقلنا للهروب من التوتر والواقع ، عندما لا نجد حل ولا نستطيع أن نعبر عما بداخلنا فنقنع أنفسنا أن النوم، أو الانشغال، أو الأكل، أو المشي كفيل بأن يجعلنا ننسى ما حدث ومشاعرنا تجاهه ، لكن الواقع أقسى من ذلك ، لأن أثر هذه المشاعر سوف يظهر ، سواء الآ

1🔥1

Signed رَوْنون

30 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed رَوْنون

25 Jun 2026, 00:15 UTC647 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

كنت عم بفكر أكتب عن تعفن الدماغ ، بس طلعت ناشرة عنه من سنتين ، وحبيت الحلول الي كاتبيتها . بتعرفوا رح اجرب الحلول هي كونه آخر فترة جد عم بحس حالي ما عم بنجز بيومي ، وأخبركم بالنتيجة .

5

Signed رَوْنون

24 Jun 2026, 15:57 UTC630 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

صرلي زمان ما كتبت ، احكولي رأيكم بالمقال ، وازا في مواضيع تانية حابين اكتب عنها 🌚

4💘1

Signed رَوْنون

24 Jun 2026, 15:52 UTC636 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

حين تدرك أنك ورثت أو اكتسبت بعض أنماط والديك السلوكية دون وعي، تكون قد قطعت نصف الطريق نحو التغيير ، والنصف الثاني هو تدريب نفسك على تغيير سلوكك للأفضل بحيث يناسبك ويناسب بيئتك؛ وهي رحلة تحتاج بالتأكيد إلى صبر ووقت لأنك تفكك أنماطاً عشت بها لسنوات، لكنها خطوة تصنع مصيرك الجديد. فَالوراثة قد تمنحنا الاستعداد، والبيئة قد تغذيه، لكن الوعي يمنحنا فرصة التعامل معه وتغييره. دُمتم بخير 💙

6

Signed رَوْنون

24 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC443 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

إذاً، زبدة الموضوع: الوعي لا يلغي الاستعدادات الموروثة، لكنه يمنح الإنسان فرصة ملاحظتها وإدارتها بدل أن يُقاد بها دون وعي.

5

Signed رَوْنون

24 Jun 2026, 15:48 UTC438 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

روان، يعني أفهم من كلامكِ أن سلوكياتي كلها وراثية وأنا لستُ مسؤولة عنها..؟ أكيد لا؛ الأهل ينقلون لنا صفات وراثية وهي ما نسميها "الاستعداد"، ولكن الظروف البيئية هي التي تتحكم باحتمالية ظهور هذه التصرفات...كيف؟ الاستعداد: وجود بعض المتغيرات المرتبطة بجين (MAOA) قد يرتبط باستعداد أكبر للعنف والعدوانية، خصوصاً مع اقترانه بظروف بيئية سلبية. احتمالية الظهور: بيئة نشأ بها شخص يمتلك هذا الجين وتعرض فيها للعنف، والعدوانية

5

Signed رَوْنون

24 Jun 2026, 15:45 UTC405 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

"العائلة تؤثر بقوة، لكنها لا تحدد المصير بشكل كامل" لطالما عارضتُ إحدى الدكتورات في جامعتي بشأن رأيها أن الوالدين يؤثران في الشخصية، حيث أن الطفل يكتسب منهما الكثير من سلوكياته حتى لو كان يعارضها؛ فيجد نفسه يتصرف بعصبية مثل أبيه رغم أنه يكره العصبية، والفتاة تتصرف بخضوع مثل أمها رغم أنها تكره ذلك... كنتُ أُحدث نفسي: "مستحيل هذا الأمر، كون الإنسان الواعي لتصرفاته يستطيع تغييرها للأفضل، وسوف يأخذ والديه عبرة له". إل

5

Signed رَوْنون

23 Jun 2026, 21:44 UTC331 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026

" العائلة تؤثر بقوة ، لكنها لا تحدد المصير بشكل كامل " شو رأيكم بهالمقولة ؟

3💯1

Signed رَوْنون

15 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTC444 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

خلصنا ٣ أقسام من دراسة الاضطرابات النفسية DSM-5 مع الطبيب النفسي عبادة الزين @Obadazain ، وهلأ حنبدأ بالقسم الرابع وهو آخر قسم، علما إنه الاقسام السابقة مسجلة ، ومن تجربتي الشخصية أنصح بهالكورس وبشدة لكل طلاب التخصصات النفسية، كورس مفيد جدا وغني بالمعلومات الشاملة عن الاضطرابات النفسية وتشخيصها .

3

Signed رَوْنون

15 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC439 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @Psychiatry_e_coursesPhoto

بسم الله نفتتح التسجيل في القسم الرابع والأخير من كورس DSM-V-TR، والذي نتناول في العناوين الموضحة في الصورة . ملاحظة: لا يشترط حضورك للأقسام السابقة. . للمزيد من المعلومات وللاشتراك: https://forms.gle/dSVCDrB3eYQEhWfr8

3

Signed رَوْنون

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bluepsychology5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

علم النفس : مقالات - أبحاث
@psychoanalysis_2021 · 40,254
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
فريدريك نيتشه
@Nietzsche1 · 36,364
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
باروخ سبينوزا
@Spinoza_2021 · 22,839
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مَا وَراءَ النَّفسْ 👥” (@bluepsychology5), 1,878 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluepsychology5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.