Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖇𝖑𝖚𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖔𝖓•°○

Channel

𝖇𝖑𝖚𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖔𝖓•°○

@bluemoonX7tj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004374681701
TypeChannel
Username@bluemoonX7tj
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bluemoonX7tj

Growth

1041181117 August 2026 — 105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 104 subscribers14 August 2026 — 118 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:16118+14
9 Aug 2026, 09:30104no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:28104-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:13105first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.59%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.8
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total140
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026

پرواز کردم روحم جلا یافت رفتم بهش

Signed wolfy

9 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC6 viewsread 9 August 2026

پزد و پخت کرد پخت و پزد کرد

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC6 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC2 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @golden_dawn33Photo

کیفیتش نابود شد💔

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

9 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC2 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @golden_dawn33Photo

صبح بخیر

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

9 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @CheshireArtsPhoto

The Forbidden Spark The past is darker than it seems... You may be witnessing the reason why Asterion lost not one, but two hearts. He only has three after all. The one time he put aside his pride for his love. Only to find betrayal. The only time.. Tnx koyo for drawing this gorgeous btw💙✨ #Asterion #Killan #Lore

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

8 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mikalisia

این پست + این پیام فورارد کنید یک پست مشخص کنید فورش میزنم تا حمایت بشه و بر اساس آرت استایلتون بهتون آرت استایلی رو معرفی کنم که نزدیک سبکتون باشه تا امتحانش کنید🔮

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

8 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mikalisiaPhoto

HBD TO MY LOVELY FATHER:@Ru_sxk

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

8 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mikalisiaPhoto

⊹ ࣪ ˖🕰️୭˚. 🗝️ #old

Signed ꜱꜱᴛᴀʀx🪽

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bluemoonX7tj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 978,531 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖇𝖑𝖚𝖊𝖒𝖔𝖔𝖓•°○” (@bluemoonX7tj), 118 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluemoonX7tj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.