Channel
@bluegold_trader_nymex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
633subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003246945731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bluegold_trader_nymex |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bluegold_trader_nymex |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 633 | +8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 625 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 620 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 611 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 607 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 606 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
118 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 115 | 97.5% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EIA #NATGAS REPORT · My projection for today's EIA report is below with the market consensus – meaning that I expect a smaller build relative to the market expectations – which implies a possibility for a “bullish surprise”. However, any surprise is possible. · Reuters survey: +31 bcf · Bluegold Trader: +28 bcf (South Central: -8 bcf) · LSEG: +30 bcf · Gelber & Associates: +30 …
👍5
U.S. dry #natgas production posted a sharp early dip today, currently estimated at 108.1 Bcf/d. As is typical with initial flow numbers, expect upward revisions as additional pipeline data reports later today and tomorrow. 📈
👍4
Non-degree-day factors are once again boosting Electric Power #natgas consumption after three consecutive months of drag. Two primary catalysts are driving the shift: 1. Wind drop-off: Wind generation has moderated (August is historically a weak month for wind output). 2. Coal-to-gas switching: Subdued gas prices relative to coal continue to favor gas-fired power burn.
👍6
Investment activity in the #oil & #natgas sector is heating up fast. 📈 Key Q2/May highlights: 🔹 Private fixed investment in mining exploration, shafts, and wells : Up +$12.7B in Q2 2026—the largest quarterly jump in 3 years. 🔹 New Equipment Orders: Hit $2.2B in May, an 11+ year high. 🔹 Unfilled Machinery Backlog: Reached $6.7B in May, highest since Nov 2015. Is this the start of a sustained multi-year capex cycle, …
👍4
SUNDAY #NATGAS FUNDAMENTALS · Sunday’s 12z weather models are mixed vs Friday’s 12z results. · GFS is relatively neutral (+2 bcf). · ECMWF is bearish (-6 bcf). · In absolute terms: Over the next 16 days (inc. today), GFS projects consumption to average 77.7 bcf/d (substantially above the norm). Over the next 15 days (inc. today), ECMWF projects consumption to average 76.9 bcf/d (subst…
👍5
Over the next 20 days, U.S. #natgas consumption in the Electric Power Sector (powerburn) is projected to average 48.2 Bcf/d (+1.6 bcf/d yoy). The next 10 days look particularly intense, averaging +5.0 bcf/d yoy.
👍10
EIA #NATGAS REPORT · My projection for today’s EIA report is in line with the market consensus – meaning that I expect a similar build relative to the market expectations – which implies a possibility for a neutral surprise”. However, any surprise is possible. · Reuters survey: +35 bcf · Bluegold Trader: +34 bcf (South Central: -9 bcf) · LSEG: +32 bcf · Gelber & Associates: +35…
👍9
Total Degree Days (TDDs)—a key measure of energy demand—are currently projected to stay mostly above both the seasonal norm and last year’s levels. #natgas
👍5👎1
Is #natgas undervalued? https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/is-the-us-natural-gas-undervalued-202607281012
👍10👎1
Yesterday, U.S. net supply of dry #natgas (production + imports − exports) reached 94.736 Bcf/d—its highest level since December 14, 2025. Historically, net supply tends to peak twice a year, during the seasonal demand surges in July and December.
👍7
SUNDAY #NATGAS FUNDAMENTALS · Sunday’s 12z weather models are mixed vs Friday’s 12z results. · GFS is bullish (+6 bcf). · ECMWF is bearish (-12 bcf). · In absolute terms: Over the next 16 days (inc. today), GFS projects consumption to average 77.5 bcf/d (substantially above the norm). Over the next 15 days (inc. today), ECMWF projects consumption to average 76.9 bcf/d (above the norm)…
👍8
U.S. #natgas storage deficit vs 2025 is projected to continue expanding.
👍7👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bluegold_trader_nymex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BGT (NYMEX) Channel” (@bluegold_trader_nymex), 633 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluegold_trader_nymex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.