Сидим с хуйлом за столом https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSqdf1Cab/ #анямация #видео прснж: #вб #озон вслн: #ркн_и_друзья
🆒6custom 52559958036248310113

Channel
@bluefishcompanylol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
390subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001889021221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bluefishcompanylol |
| Description | Канал, посвященный творчеству по проектам BlueFish Company. Это частично личный канал Фиша. Подпишитесь, чтобы не терять новости о проектах! Наш дискорд: https://discord.gg/jbNS7mPz Наш ютуб: https://www.youtube.com/@bluefishcompany |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bluefishcompanylol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 390 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 390 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (31 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,431 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 19 | 38.0% | |
| custom 5255995803624831011 | 8 | 16.0% | |
| 🍌 | 8 | 16.0% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5256103761922785548 | 5 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5262784669451058350 | 4 | 8.00% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сидим с хуйлом за столом https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSqdf1Cab/ #анямация #видео прснж: #вб #озон вслн: #ркн_и_друзья
🆒6custom 52559958036248310113
колындар
чо мне никто не отвечает
custom 52627846694510583502
в чем прикол койота против акны
🍌4
Писюнчесуны #бумажки #не_свое
🆒7
Можвадь #бумажки прснж: #можвадь
🍌3🆒1custom 52559958036248310111custom 52561037619227855481
постил ли я хз но вот офис сбербанка прснж: #сбер вслн: #ркн_и_друзья
🆒5
😛Итоги за лето: Сделано 3 видео; Развили БФК в плане лора, ну там бог появился и тд; Наебал вас тем что пообещал делать инфу о тварях бфк честно я расскажу патом; Появилось дохерище скетчей; Никакую игру не провели нахуй го сегодня в гартик и откроем вайтборд; Я проебал прем; Я начал делать новый тип контента, и это бумажки, могу делать то что скажете ибо я уже хз че делать. Вот рял скажите че делать мне делать нехуй…
Потрошитель Барби ты мой лучник #гартик
custom 52561037619227855483custom 52559958036248310111
ааааааааа осень
Назовите любого персонажа кумикуми или ума и хрума а я нарисую
буль буль редбуль
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bluefishcompanylol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlueFish co. — творческий канал !” (@bluefishcompanylol), 390 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluefishcompanylol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.