Channel
@bluechip_org
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
180subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001817102337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bluechip_org |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bluechip_org |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 180 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 179 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 181 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 181 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 394 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Bluechip25 | Future of Stablecoins & Payments in Europe Stablecoins provide a permanent bid for government debt. Washington figured it out. Brussels hasn't. The US looks at a stablecoin issuer and sees a buyer of American debt. So it regulates with a view to grow adoption. The EU looks at the same issuer and sees a threat to monetary sovereignty. So it regulates with a view to contain systemic risk. 🎥 Anchoring T…
Luis Schaubhut at Bluechip25 The ECB's digital euro will work till the borders of Europe. That's where EUR stablecoins can takeover. The digital euro will be designed on a closed system, where access may be limited only to big banks. But the EUR stablecoin on a public chain has no border. Two wallets, one token, and the euro travels globally. 🎥 Luis Schaubhut from AllUnity explains at Bluechip25. Watch the full k…
Luis Schaubhut at Bluechip25 "Europe's payment infrastructure does not belong to Europe." Stripe. PayPal. Alipay. The payment rails used by Europeans are built and owned somewhere else entirely. Reclaiming payment sovereignty means using every form of tokenized money: digital euro, stablecoins, and onchain bank deposits. 🎥 Luis Schaubhut from AllUnity explains at Bluechip25. Watch the full keynote here. Get supe…
Raiffeisen Bank International (RBI) at Bluechip26 RBI is returning to Bluechip26 as our Presenting Partner for the second year in a row! RBI is a full service, universal bank that serves more than 18 million customers across Central and Eastern Europe. Bluechip26 is the world's first and leading conference dedicated to crypto safety. Get super early bird tickets to Bluechip26 here (40% off until Aug 31). 📍 Nov 1…
Bluechip25 | Luis Schaubhut, Chief of Staff at AllUnity The road to EUR stablecoin adoption goes through the banks. Companies will never self-custody meaningful amounts. And a crypto custodian is too much counterparty risk. They want their trusted bank. So the EUR goes onchain only when banks custody stablecoins. Not just their own, but all of them. 🎥 Luis Schaubhut from AllUnity explains at Bluechip25. Watch the…
Bernhard Haslhofer and Martin Bechter at Bluechip25 Billions have been lost to DeFi hacks. But Martin Bechter says they are necessary. His analogy: DeFi is like a kid in kindergarten. It has to catch the viruses to build an immune system. Every attack exposes a weak spot, and every exploit becomes a lesson. The protocols that survive them come out harder to kill. 🎥 Bernhard Haslhofer from Complexity Science Hub a…
Krzysztof Paruch at Bluechip25 Bitcoin is the gold standard for decentralization in crypto. Bitcoin is also 17 years old. DeFi is only 6 years old. Judging the ecosystem for being too centralized at such an early stage might be unfair. Early on, centralization allows you to control risk and bootstrap growth. Decentralization is earned over time as the protocol matures. 🎥 Krzysztof Paruch from Token Engineering La…
Bluechip25 | Convergence of TradFi and DeFi Apps A week before Bluechip25, Georg got de-banked because 60% of his company's cash flow runs in crypto. That's the state of DeFi converging with TradFi. The banks shut the door on crypto-heavy companies while piloting onchain settlement. To survive this merger, the two systems need identity and accountability rails that work for both sides. 🎥 CeFi to DeFi: Convergence…
Harald Uhlig on Bluechip Dialogues Fed Governor Chris Waller wants master accounts for stablecoins, but he's silent on whether they should pay interest. The banks are against interest on stablecoins, because that's easy money for them. But a limited account without interest can pass. And when enough people hold stablecoins, the public will ask the banks: how come you earn interest while we don't? 🎥 Harald Uhlig t…
A Stablecoin Safety Layer For Stellar We're happy to receive a grant under SCF #44 from the Stellar Community Fund. This allows us to build a Stablecoin Safety Layer For Stellar: • Activity Dashboard tracking all stablecoin metrics with charts & data exports • Wallet Rating Tool that scores each address for aggregate stablecoin safety • New Bluechip ratings for three Stellar-native stablecoins Thank you to the Ste…
Harald Uhlig on Bluechip Dialogues Can you have a bank run on the central bank? Yes. In fact, you've already lived through one. During a normal bank run, people rush to swap their deposits for dollars. During a central bank run, people rush to swap their dollars for goods. By this definiation, hyperinflation is a run on the central bank. And COVID's toilet paper shortages were a short preview. 🎥 Harald Uhlig talk…
Bluechip Dialogues #10 | Harald Uhlig, Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Banks can park money at the Federal Reserve and earn risk-free interest. Nobody else can do that. Harald Uhlig, an economist at the University of Chicago, asks: "How is that fair?" He argues that stablecoin issuers should also get interest-bearing master accounts at the Fed. He predicts that as stablecoins gain adoption, th…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bluechip_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 517,419 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bluechip Notifications” (@bluechip_org), 180 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluechip_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.