Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BLACKLIST RENTAL

@blrent

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001750869872
TypeChannel
Username@blrent
DescriptionPengaduan : @PengaduanRFbot Mohon sertakan kronologi dan bukti yang jelas dan rinci saat mengirim pengaduan.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/blrent

Growth

218219218.56 Aug 2026, 22:42 — 218 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:54 — 219 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:30 — 219 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:427 Aug 2026, 03:30
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:30219no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:54219+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:42218first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.7%
avg views ÷ 219 subscribers
Avg views / post
240
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held17 (11 February 202521 July 2026)
Views total961
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 1 post, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1737.8%
🤨920.0%
😐613.3%
🥱511.1%
🔥48.89%
🤣36.67%
💋12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC766 viewsread 7 August 2026

[INFORMATION] Selamat siang, Renties. Rentalentfess ingin memberikan informasi terkait adanya laporan pada bot pengaduan mengenai faker yang telah dilakukan seorang talent dengan identitas sebagai berikut : 1. Jude Mason @nockly (8027871922) 2. Rydel @dongcpyoy (7039258378) 3. N.I Fayruha @heirtyc (7606744832) (sebelumnya menggunakan @maskucline) Serta seorang talent lainnya dengan identitas sebagai berikut : 1.

4 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC524 viewsread 7 August 2026

[INFORMATION] Selamat sore, Renties. Rentalentfess ingin memberikan informasi terkait adanya laporan pada bot pengaduan mengenai kasus pelecehan sekskual yang telah dilakukan seorang customer dengan identitas sebagai berikut : 1. Afreensa Hussein @MOVIESCEENN (7396331555) Pelaku melakukan pelecehan seksual terhadap seorang talent saat sesi sedang berlangsung. Hal ini tentunya sangat merugikan bagi korban. Mengenai

1 Jul 2026, 01:49 UTC238 viewsread 7 August 2026

👤 8761853671 👦🏻 Christopher. 🌐 @Gallagherf 🇬🇧 English 🕑 Diperbarui pada 12/06/2026 👤 7030244110 👦🏻 Juan. 🌐 @YearnForGwen 🇬🇧 English 🕑 Diperbarui pada 28/03/2026

30 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,030 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

[INFORMATION] Selamat malam, Renties. Rentalentfess ingin memberikan informasi terkait adanya laporan pada bot pengaduan mengenai salah satu talent yang merugikan customer dan agensi tempat talent tersebut bernaung dengan identitas sebagai berikut: 1. Rowen, @entotE (8239034653) 2. Jose, @Suzcker (6991883409) Pelaku menggunakan jasa vn dari sebuah store dan membeli foto dump untuk memenuhi kebutuhan selama sesi de

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @blrent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BLACKLIST RENTAL” (@blrent), 219 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blrent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.