Channel
@blowhardob
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004492911159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blowhardob |
| Created | 27 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blowhardob |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 9 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 8 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 8 | first reading |
2 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2 (27 July 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,300 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
古人云：“食、色，性也；饮食男女，人之大欲存焉。”吾月余未近女色，二弟颇有蠢蠢之意。念自前番与熙若一别，忽已数周，遂启 Telegram，传讯邀之，约以今日午初相会。 熙若问曰：“君尝试角色扮演之戏乎？” 吾曰：“此为何物？吾未尝试也。” 熙若笑曰：“未尝试则尤妙。君今日来，正可一试，必有别趣。” 吾闻之甚悦，遂驱车往其所。既至，登楼而上，见门扉虚掩，遂径入焉。 先是，熙若已将今日之戏告于吾。其所扮者，乃独守香闺之妇，良人赴宴未归，夜深灯残，独候闺中；吾则依约扮作故人，乘夜而至。此戏皆由两人先通其意，进退有约，所行所止，皆以隐语为信，未尝相强。 熙若浴罢，更著薄绡寝衣，以轻纱蒙目，倚榻静候。室内银灯微明，绣帘半卷，香气隐隐，颇有幽情。 未几，吾轻启房门，缓步而入。熙若闻衣袂微响，知吾已至，却仍依戏中之意，含笑问曰：“今日何来之迟，使妾久候，妾屄水四流矣～” 吾默然不答，但解其衣裳，举阳具挺而入蜜穴内，熙若喜而叹曰…
👍1
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @blowhardob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 457,418 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“少年游” (@blowhardob), 9 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blowhardob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.