Валентина Челинцова. Портрет заслуженной артистки РСФСР А. С. Лесковой. 1951. Челябинский государственный музей изобразительных искусств #духи_и_картины
❤2🔥2

Channel
@blognumberfive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002573459246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blognumberfive |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blognumberfive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 146 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 145 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 145 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (16 May 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 53 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 32.2% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 28.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Валентина Челинцова. Портрет заслуженной артистки РСФСР А. С. Лесковой. 1951. Челябинский государственный музей изобразительных искусств #духи_и_картины
❤2🔥2
В книге воспоминаний Веры Алентовой «Все не случайно» есть эпизод о духах. Она — третьекурсница Школы-студии МХАТ. На гастроли в Москву приехал итальянский театр. Актрис для ролей без реплик с собой не везли — нашли на месте: Алентову и еще одну студентку. Спектакли сыграны — и вот появляются духи: Расставались мы с итальянскими актрисами нежно... актриса брызнула мне на шерстяную кофточку каплю духов. Это был совер…
❤🔥7👍1
Справа Zielinski & Rozen, что ли? :) Татьяна Нечеухина. У зеркала. 2025 год #духи_и_картины
👍3
Анжела Джерих. Саша + Наташа. 2026 🙃 #духи_и_картины
😁4👍3
Анжела Джерих. Духи. 2026 #духи_и_картины
❤7👏2🔥2
Друзья, прошу прощения, что сиреневый марафон прервался: было не до духов. Постараюсь продолжить. А пока вместо извинений картина: Беляев Николай Яковлевич (1916-2004), «Сирень у трельяжа в раме», 1987 год. Я узнаю тут коробочку «Красного мака» и флакончик Pani Walewska. А остальное.... Знаю, что Галина Анни @galaanniparfum любит картины с флакончиками. Вся надежда на нее 🙏❤️ #духи_и_картины #сирень
👍5❤1
💐 «Настоящая персидская сирень», Новая Заря Об этом аромате у меня три новости — одна плохая и две хорошие. Начнем с плохой: флакон. Роскошно жить не запретишь — скопипастили тару у Miss Dior, как сумели. Ну ничего, я и не такое видела. К 8 Марта в местном кафе сделали печенья в виде флаконов с духами: форма — от Miss Dior, а надпись — Chanel №5. Теперь к хорошим новостям: 1. Снова флакон: этот же аромат можно ку…
❤4
💐 «Персидская сирень», Новая Заря Знаю, что многим все парфюмы с выраженной нотой сирени кажутся ретро, мне — только этот. И мне он нравится. Согревающий кокон из корицы вблизи и цветочный в шлейфе. Точно так и настоящая сирень производит совершенно разное впечатление, когда утыкаешься носом в соцветия (или ставишь большой букет в маленькой комнате) — и когда просто гуляешь вдоль сиреневой аллеи. Мне больше всего нр…
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Еще на прошлых выходных перенюхала кучу сортов сирени в ботаническом саду. Во-первых, делюсь красотой. Во-вторых, немного ароматных впечатлений: 🟣Ни один куст не пах так, как часто описывают сиреневые парфюмы люди, которым эти парфюмы понравились: хрустальная свежесть, весна во флаконе и вот это все. В теплый солнечный день сирень пахла пыльно, горько, пряно (да, именно корицей, как это часто бывает в духах), но ник…
💯6❤3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @blognumberfive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 667,155 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог № 5” (@blognumberfive), 146 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blognumberfive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.