Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 16:20
44
-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:01
45
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:19
45
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 10 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
32
43.8%
🔥
19
26.0%
❤🔥
8
11.0%
👍
7
9.59%
😁
3
4.11%
🐳
2
2.74%
😱
1
1.37%
🙏
1
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2023 to 25 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня так достал блоггинг
Я уже столько раз выгорала от него. Бросала. Начинала с начала. И снова выгорала. Иногда до нервных срывов и успокоительного. Я даже думала, что это не моё.
И знаете, возможно, блоггинг и правда не для всех. И речь не о способностях, таланте или наборе качеств. А в целом об образе жизни блоггера.
Комфортно ли тебе ВСЕГДА быть на виду?
Комфортно ли ПОЛ ДНЯ сидеть в телефоне?
Комфортно, что …
Зачем я веду блог?
Нет мотивации.
Не вижу результатов.
Выгораю.
Устаю вести блог, уходит вся энергия.
Нет идей, что снимать, о чем говорить.
👆🏻 Это всё последствия того, что ты не знаешь, а зачем ИМЕННО ТЕБЕ вести блог. Отсутствие четкого и понятного ответа.
Для мозга 🧠 всё просто: «не понимаю, зачем это делать = не делаю».
Ведь он всегда старается экономить нашу энергию и ресурсы.
И цель должна быть не в цифрах …
У меня тут случился лучший подарок!!
По фоткам, думаю, вы уже догадываетесь какой 🐤
Хотела себе такой фотоаппарат лет 7. И все время откладывала эту покупку. То денег не было, то всегда находилось что-то более «важное», то подарки более «интересные».
И тут то ли в честь дня матери, то ли в честь того, как я плотно поработала последние 2 недели (у меня прошло моё оффлайн мероприятие! я провела челлендж: «30 рилс з…
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Можете поздравить меня 🥳 на днях я провела СВОЙ первый ЖИВОЙ мастер-класс по контенту!
✅ Да, прямо живой — мы встретились физически в уютном месте в центре СПБ
✅ Да, прямо мастер-класс — мы вместе снимали контент, делали сторителлинг и разбирали различные ситуации и вопросы
Ребята собрались разные: кто-то только начинал свой блог,
кто-то давно вел и даже продавал свои услуги,
а кто-то давно работал в смм
Но КАЖДЫ…
МОЖНО не тратить на контент целый день.
2 часов в день достаточно, чтобы сделать крутейшие сторис (с прогревом 🤌🏻), снять видео для рилс, написать пост.
2 часов хватает, чтобы СДЕЛАТЬ ВЕСЬ КОНТЕНТ
Как? А это я расскажу в это воскресенье 19.11
Ребята из СПб, приглашаю вас на живой мастер-класс
⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️💛
⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️
Где мы научимся снимать крутые сторис в моменте.
Я научу каждого раскрывать абсолютно любую…
— Снимала рилс целый день вчера
— Сколько успела сделать?
— Один
— ….
Вот такой диалог недавно состоялся у меня во время интервью. Я была в шоке, как можно весь день снимать 1 только рилс? 🤯
Рассказала об этом друзьям. Они смотрели на меня с таким лицом: 😐
Сказали, что им это тоже знакомо и они за день делают по 1 видео.
Ребят, это НЕ НОРМАЛЬНО!
Тратить столько времени на 1 видос, который может не залететь, потом…
Я хочу начать вести свой блог и зарабатывать/искать клиентов в соц сетях53%
Я не веду блог и не планирую13%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bloggingvkaef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Я хочу начать вести свой блог и зарабатывать/искать клиентов в соц сетях53%
Я не веду блог и не планирую13%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2023 to 25 January 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бложить в кайф 🍑 с Лесей” (@bloggingvkaef), 44 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bloggingvkaef.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.