С вот такой стёжкой. Это всё для РОЗОВОГО, конечно, который здесь, конечно: https://igravcvet.ru/aboutpink (если вам вдруг интересно)
❤34🔥4
Signed Nina

Channel
@blog_niname
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
862subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001883446429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blog_niname |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blog_niname |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 862 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 863 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 863 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
393 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 222 | 56.5% | |
| 🔥 | 133 | 33.8% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 5.85% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.05% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С вот такой стёжкой. Это всё для РОЗОВОГО, конечно, который здесь, конечно: https://igravcvet.ru/aboutpink (если вам вдруг интересно)
❤34🔥4
Signed Nina
Вот такой пятничный подух получился. Чтобы настраиваться на отвязные выходные. В кино там с ним сходить или на танцы...
🔥24❤11
Signed Nina
Закрасила последний квадратик! Осталась окантовка. О-е! Предыдущий шаг --- в предыдущем посте! )
❤21🔥13👍2
Signed Nina
Про стежку красного квилта. Я где-то на середине, но очень-очень и очень хочу дня за два-три ее закончить. Предыдущий шаг этой истории здесь.
❤35🔥7🥰3
Signed Nina
Чуть-чуть августа ) Последнее видео о том, что будет, если лечь на сапе посреди реки и смотреть в небо. Кайфа много, эффективность низкая, но вариантов нету. Так что я всё же что-то делаю. А вы как поживаете?
❤47🔥5
Signed Nina
Обложка на тетрадку для августа из подручных материалов. Знаете, что это за бумага? И да, я как обычно, что вижу о том и пою. Разборки дома, всякие цветочки и ягоды и сап в качестве десерта. Предыдущий месяц был тут, если что )
❤25🔥4
Signed Nina
Окошки в Коломне. Я думала, что все наличники будут в основном одного типа, но они очень разные. Коллаж сделала на коленке, хотелось увидеть их все разом. Какой тип вам больше нравится? (В комментариях картинки по отдельности, можно всё рассмотреть.)
❤35🔥13
Signed Nina
Не, представляете, что происходит?? @olya_sews Оля, поздравляю!!!! Урааааа!!! 1-е и 3-е места в новичковой категории в Бирмингеме. Юля в "Игре" напишет сегодня. Но я вообще балдею уже сейчас и этим хочется делиться! )))
🔥53👏10❤8
Signed Nina
Я наконец-то добралась до соединения звёздочек с начинкой и бэком. Правда сделала это совершенно жульническим методом. Не уверена пока, что у меня получается. Возможно, чистый брак ))) Но риск — благородное дело, а Париж стоит мессы вроде бы, и, в любом случае, теперь оба топа готовы к стёжке. Можно ехать в глушь с ними и нитками для ручной стёжки спокойненько ))) Отдельная радость — удалось кое-как растянуть имеющи…
👍21🔥10❤6👏2
Signed Nina
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @blog_niname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нина и дом КАНАЛ” (@blog_niname), 862 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blog_niname.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.