Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VRTX

@blogVRTX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

268subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005986473
TypeChannel
Username@blogVRTX
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blogVRTX

Growth

268271269.57 August 2026 — 271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 270 subscribers8 August 2026 — 270 subscribers14 August 2026 — 268 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 268–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:05268-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:48270no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:41270-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:21271first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53435455938075216435848.3%
custom 52897227558711629005142.5%
custom 5233601595035370736119.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2025 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blogVRTX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2025 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 17:06 UTC108 views19 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🩹 КАК БЫ ДАЛЕКО НИ ЗАШЁЛ, ВОЗВРАЩАЙСЯ Уже давно не притрагивался к рисованию из-за всяких форс-мажоров, но наконец руки дошли👍 Вся эта подотчётность и правда помогает возвращаться к цели. Спасибо всем понятым!! Благодаря подотчетности, любое безделье по отношению к цели моментально превращается в жесткий заёб с чувством вины, апатии, уныния, страха, внутри личностным конфликтам, депрессии, агрессии, вандализму,

custom 528972275587116290014custom 53435455938075216435

23 May 2026, 14:13 UTC165 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nasty_patPhoto

Наброски во время просмотра кинолент помогают нам оценить композицию кадра и работу оператора, как художника. 💗 Особенно в фильмах до 2000х годов очень круто подходили к композиции в кадре и движению камеры. Я поражаюсь иногда тому, что без классного оператора работа режиссера была бы совершенно не интересна и картина не выглядела бы такой красивой. раньше в фильмах было много "немых" сцен и они не выглядели скучно

custom 52897227558711629007custom 53435455938075216432

11 Apr 2026, 13:27 UTC251 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🩹 ОКАЗЫВАЕТСЯ ЧТОБ НОРМ РИСОВАТЬ - НАДО РИСОВАТЬ…. Уже всё ближе и ближе к свээгу! По тихоньку рука набивается, но ещё прям большой объём инфы нужно усвоить. Хочу выразить жёсткий респект Анастасии Патриной, на поток мне удалось попасть именно к ней. Помимо объёма в рамках курса, Настя много времени уделяет каждому из участников группы, даёт и фидбечит задачки по академическому рисунку - всякие кубы\драпировки\п

custom 52897227558711629007custom 53435455938075216433

28 Feb 2026, 13:24 UTC296 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hellbrush_artPhoto

Не один аддон в блендере даже близко для ретопа не лучше Topogun. Я сказал все.

custom 53435455938075216434custom 52897227558711629001

24 Feb 2026, 06:50 UTC327 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вообще, если доверять исследованию - Matthews (2015) RCT, Dominican Univ То подотчётность увеличивает на 20-25% достижение цели. Поэтому мне тут нужны понятые!! Буду по возможности закидывать апдейты по учёбе😉 Надеюсь, что под конец курса, глядя на эти первые кринжовые стадики, буду думать, что всё это было не зря! Если нет, снесу все эти посты👍

custom 53435455938075216436custom 52897227558711629001

24 Feb 2026, 06:49 UTC272 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️‍🩹 ПОДТЯГИВАЕМ ХУДОЖКУ ! Меня всегда пугало выдрачивать художественную базу, всю эту кучу драпировок, непонятные вазы, вечные натюрморты А ничё тот факт, что типо лол… Чёт не свага нихуя сидеть часами малевать эти штрихи. Да и так это всё воспринималось несовременно, уныло и абсолютно непонятно: зачем это вообще и как это всё применять в дальнейшем?? Но сейчас, будучи трёхмерщиком, я понимаю на сколько мне не хва

custom 52897227558711629008custom 53435455938075216434

31 Dec 2025, 21:08 UTC377 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С Новым годом, друзья !!

custom 534354559380752164313custom 52897227558711629002

1 Jul 2025, 14:16 UTC761 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hellbrush_art

Прошу максимальной поддержки вашим лайком и особенно комментом на станции! https://www.artstation.com/artwork/QKVyEZ Внутри много материала!!! Ну и за репост этой записи буду признателен)

custom 53435455938075216437custom 52336015950353707363custom 52897227558711629002

20 Jun 2025, 13:12 UTC617 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @anton_nemo_art

Всем привет, это моя первая модель в 3д, занимаюсь всего месяц, генерировал через аи, оцените уровень пж ❤️ https://www.artstation.com/artwork/5W2NPP

custom 53435455938075216438custom 52897227558711629004

4 Jun 2025, 09:20 UTCviews —19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52336015950353707368custom 53435455938075216436custom 52897227558711629005

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @blogVRTX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VRTX” (@blogVRTX), 268 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blogVRTX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.