Channel
@blockfuchi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
177subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001675511525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockfuchi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockfuchi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 177 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 180 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 180 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
132 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 40.9% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 24.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 9.85% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 6.06% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 5.30% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.27% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.27% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 1.52% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.758% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.758% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 16 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blockfuchi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2025 to 16 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хоть и не сразу, но дропаю вам бота на чек-ины, чтобы моим любимым подпрыщикам было проще фармить на миллион акков. Все вопросы можете задавать тут, инструкции же по ссылке😎 https://github.com/UMFUCHI/Bluewhale-Check-In https://github.com/UMFUCHI/Bluewhale-Check-In https://github.com/UMFUCHI/Bluewhale-Check-In
❤4🔥1😱1
AFK фарм дропа в Circles Circles - это децентрализованный протокол, позволяющий каждому возможность создавать деньги напрямую. Инвест скрыт(ну или его нет😁), но как по мне это не показатель, мы же в крипте за идею, правда ведь? Чтобы начать фарм залетаем по ссылке и в их дискорд, в дискорде проходим капчу и в канале #trust пишем про себя и дропаем ссылку на свой акк. После чего просто ждем чтобы кто-то нас инвайтну…
❤3🐳1🔥1
Блок фучика pinned «Как за месяц я стал рабом системы 🤩 Ну да, пропал. И что? Если вы ждали постов про крипту или думали, что я ушёл в закат с 7 figs, то нет, всё гораздо прозаичнее. Как-то так случилось что я переехал в Польшу. Поскольку доход с крипты у меня был и остается…»
Подтвержденный мега-дроп за чек-ины Речь пойдет о BluWhale - интерфейс для анализа кошельков как Debank, НО с интегрированным AI. По инвесту у нас целых $100KK от DWF, SwissBorg, Animoca, SBI и др. Сам проект запустил компанию по фарму поинтов еще весной, но с моего инфополя его никто не отрабатывает, а зря, тк дроп подтвержден на конец 2025 года. Чтобы залутать дроп летим по ссылке, подключаем кош , делаем квесты…
❤3🐳1🔥1
Как за месяц я стал рабом системы 🤩 Ну да, пропал. И что? Если вы ждали постов про крипту или думали, что я ушёл в закат с 7 figs, то нет, всё гораздо прозаичнее. Как-то так случилось что я переехал в Польшу. Поскольку доход с крипты у меня был и остается очень нестабильным, было принято решение искать работу. Поиски длились относительно недолго, всего за неделю я нашел работу с помощью которой я смогу выживать(!).…
❤7
NEXUS раздали дополнительно 10к поинтов, тем кто фармил первую неделю тестнета, приятно конечно, но нахуя, а главное зачем😁
❤4😁2🔥1
Хоть и с опозданием но Stars Bank Season 2 За время что я не писал о них, случилась куча изменений: - добавили бета доступ на сутки - наконец-то нормальная рефка внутри аппки - можно сделать 2 чек-ина за сутки 00:00-12:00 и с 12:01-23:59 - теперь за чек-ины получаем кристаллы, которые являются множителями(по сути ниче не поменяли 😁) - новые квесты - запустили амбасадорку Каждый день проверяется, сколько чек-инов сд…
❤3👍2❤🔥1
ГМ тут пустыня чекер выкатила На скрине можно увидеть, на нас выделили всего 8% от сапплая 🤣 Да и к тому же присутствует вестинг 6 месяцев🤣 И раздали в основном участникам закрытого тестнета🤣 А меня побрили кстати, листинги будут на Binance, OKX, Bitget и MEXC в 15:00 по МСК/Киев Если тоже хотите разочароваться, смотрим тут Если хотите ознакомиться с более детальной токеномикой: тык
😭3❤2😁2
В Nexus сегодня открыли доступ для всех регионов, так же можно просто "майнить" через WEB версию, и CLI(нода). Из нового сделали нормальный гайд на установку 😁 Я поставлю CLI только на мейн, а на твинки запущу WEB
❤3👍1🔥1
Nexus 3й сезон Стартует 23 июня в 19:00 по МСК/Киев. Уже, кстати, закрыли Devnet. Пока инфы по тестнету нет, возможно будут те же активности, если что - сообщу. https://x.com/NexusLabs/status/1936160860004917294
❤3👀1👍1
Ура перемога у Stars Bank Наконец настало 21 июня, и мы можем вывести наши миллиарды, скоро должен начаться второй сезон, думаю тож можно лететь 🥺 Ваши награды переведутся в TON и после подключения кошелька можно вывести
🥰3❤2🔥2
ура перемога, $SAHARA TGE, листинг уже подтвержден на ОКХ
🔥3❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blockfuchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,026,296 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блок фучика” (@blockfuchi), 177 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockfuchi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.