Channel
@bliang6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002064057956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bliang6 |
| Description | 购买联系 八两 @baliang |
| Created | 10 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bliang6 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 11 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 11 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 10 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
用户名出售 @g88t88 15 @j88q88 15 @h88z88 15 @iiiiky 25 @jrcccc 25 @reffff 25 @krvvvv 25 @gxhhhh 25 @dpnpn abcbc格式 20 @qukuanma 取款妈 20 @qukuange 取款哥 20 @duzid 肚子 25u @niubijiejie 牛逼姐姐 28 @liaoga 廖咖 30 @liaogan 廖干 35 @qianchuo 钱绰/前戳 45 @cuoshui 错睡 66 @vipfozi vip佛子 88 @svipxiong svip熊 188 🍪🍪总导航🍪NFT888出售🍪更多业务🍪礼物导航🍪全网表情包🍪🍪
NFT用户名好处： 🟢永久用户名（死号后可以随意给下一个飞机号或者频道、群组使用） 🟢增加飞机号权重，降低死号概率 🟢永恒用户名的重要性 🟢独特性： 一个精心选择的用户名可以使你在众多用户中脱颖而出，展示出你的个性 🟢辨识度： 用户名不仅代表你在平台上的身份，还可以增加你的辨识度，让别人更容易记住你。 🟢安全性： 独特的用户名可以避免被模仿，减少混淆和误解，保护你的身份和声誉。 🟢信任感： 一个稳定、专业的用户名可以增加你的可信度，给客户和合作伙伴留下深刻印象 联系 八两 @baliang 购买
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @bliang6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,079,469 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFT 用户名” (@bliang6), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bliang6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.