Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BlenderKnights

Channel

BlenderKnights

@blenderknights

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

496subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036542600
TypeChannel
Username@blenderknights
DescriptionHey Guy's. This my Official Telegram Chanel for the YouTube resource files.
First recorded26 September 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/blenderknights

Growth

49626 Sept 2026, 16:47 — 496 subscribers26 Sept 2026, 17:22 — 496 subscribers26 Sept 2026, 16:4726 Sept 2026, 17:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 495–497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 17:22496no change
26 Sept 2026, 16:47496first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Videos
3
Links
92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1768.0%
🔥416.0%
👍312.0%
🥰14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2025, 09:54 UTC865 viewsread 26 September 2026

New video up guys. It's an time lapse advance lighting video

26 Sept 2025, 01:49 UTC785 views7 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Tutorial would be live soon...

👍3❤2🔥1🥰1

16 Sept 2025, 12:06 UTC708 views4 reactionsread 26 September 2026

And if you guys want's to learn this too as well. Just hit the like button. As it's done with c4d Octane. Not blender. So will try to make course on this for you

❤4

16 Sept 2025, 12:05 UTC668 viewsread 26 September 2026

Soon new video would be live soon. But not on this. A new one. Just stay tune

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blenderknights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2025, 10:16 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Which one you prefer?

  1. Don't Ruin73%
  2. Think Again ?27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 29 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vandaar
@vandaaram · 22,672
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlenderKnights” (@blenderknights), 496 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blenderknights.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.