Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🕊 》ほっとけき °

Channel

🕊 》ほっとけき °

@blehh_archive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009307609
TypeChannel
Username@blehh_archive
Descriptionтанцы, отчаяние, коварство
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/blehh_archive

Growth

4212 Aug 2026, 22:48 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:00 — 42 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:4812 Aug 2026, 23:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:0042no change
12 Aug 2026, 22:4842first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.4%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 December 202522 July 2026)
Views total30
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
77
Videos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54067343638470699875424.2%
custom 5316507511958821476208.97%
custom 5407060429174245940188.07%
custom 5390863862687892034146.28%
🕊114.93%
custom 5244846923222894640104.48%
custom 5388803266228290163104.48%
custom 546309701780901241394.04%
custom 532140151981842593373.14%
custom 535709850484396635673.14%
custom 540706116361365487373.14%
custom 520412352938090653062.69%
custom 525369822375473621462.69%
custom 540682305492172890262.69%
custom 545617813473279293152.24%
custom 546306498164794927752.24%
custom 546085627324113698541.79%
custom 540694218872458743631.35%
custom 544082297810952035031.35%
custom 546297393693121147431.35%
10 further kinds156.73%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blehh_archive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

привет вы живы? у меня новый тгк кстати @blehh_w все сюда!! 🌟 Хелен здесь больше не живет ЖДУ

10 Apr 2026, 13:16 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😁😆😁 хихик хихик

custom 54630649816479492774custom 54070604291742459402custom 54630970178090124131custom 54632862497731047931

1 Apr 2026, 07:41 UTC107 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

у вас колени сзади грязные

custom 54070604291742459405custom 54629739369312114743custom 54630649816479492771

18 Feb 2026, 17:30 UTC204 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⬜⬜⬜ 😴 🤩🤩🤩 😴 Все группи попадают в рай. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 *тв кв немножечко крови *в комменты файлом ⌨ #арт #cmh

custom 54630970178090124138custom 54070604291742459405custom 54067343638470699873custom 54629319407409892111custom 54632862497731047931

17 Feb 2026, 19:45 UTC192 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜ by snippet. ⬜⬜⬜⬜🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ⬜⬜Не приходи на мои похороны, сука. *в комменты файлом 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⌨ #арт #playingtheangel

custom 53214015198184259337custom 54067343638470699875custom 52448469232228946404custom 54068422448356077171custom 54561781347327929311

16 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTC119 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @qqwerttttwgPhoto

🤍🔤yrokinesis 💭💭💭💭💭💭💭 15.02.2∅26|🔤ew 🔤ost ⭐️⭐️#pyrokinesis ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️#постер ⭐️ рк/рп pls

custom 54561781347327929314custom 54067343638470699872custom 52448469232228946401

6 Feb 2026, 10:18 UTC144 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

наедаюсь исскуством и запиваю музыкой

custom 54067343638470699875custom 52448469232228946404custom 53888032662282901631

5 Feb 2026, 13:00 UTC136 views9 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

кря

custom 53888032662282901638custom 53032546602225859611

31 Jan 2026, 14:01 UTC150 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

лениво пальчиком рисуем что то, пробники тянут в арт блок и глебасик все еще в процессе 🥀 ⌨ #арт #ос

custom 54067343638470699877🕊1custom 51950126925653163981custom 52448469232228946401custom 53888032662282901631custom 54066964006311398981custom 54068230549217289021

26 Jan 2026, 16:18 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

какой то ленивый артик ☕️ только не скучайте скоро полноценка будет ⌨ #арт #гифт

custom 540673436384706998710custom 54068230549217289022custom 54070611636136548732

25 Jan 2026, 13:46 UTC126 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

привет я надеюсь вы не против щп пока арт в процессе а то канал умирает как будто мне мой друг сделал реймек инструментала бонус уровня и это просто афигительно в апреле будет ровно год как я слушаю этот трек !!! скетч кстати закончен дальше лайн рендер и тд, школу отменили из-за холодов и будет больше времени на Глеба 😝 скоро скоро ⌨ #щпп

custom 54067343638470699877custom 54066964006311398981custom 54068230549217289021custom 54070611636136548731

17 Jan 2026, 18:39 UTC140 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

плейлист создан, референсы отобраны, процесс пошел скоро все будет ребят ⌨ #щпп #ос

custom 54067343638470699877custom 54070611636136548733custom 54068230549217289021

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blehh_archive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🕊 》ほっとけき °” (@blehh_archive), 42 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blehh_archive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.