Channel
@blednoenow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002209021832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blednoenow |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blednoenow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 43 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 44 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 44 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (13 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 353 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
148 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5460677478047554090 | 63 | 42.6% | |
| custom 5359834472025962176 | 37 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5359416640427540064 | 21 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5398070173565459941 | 14 | 9.46% | |
| custom 5255831117398825010 | 8 | 5.41% | |
| custom 5274039871768371709 | 5 | 3.38% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я люблю женщин @avlinrr @lina_mi_bunny0 🤭 пост убирать не буду, вы можете ещё кидать своих детишек буду на будущие ючики их брать
custom 54606774780475540909custom 52558311173988250104custom 53598344720259621762
девочки мальчики сейчас хочу пачку ючиков сделать а я всегда рисую каких-то рандомных персов там если кто-то хочет гифт - кидайте своих принцесс в комменты 😁
custom 54606774780475540908
если с мамой Широми тут многие знакомы, то с мамой Мафую никто так и не познакомился ☺️
custom 54606774780475540906custom 52740398717683717095custom 53598344720259621765
And just like the rain You cast the dust into nothing And wash out the salt from my hands So touch me again I feel my shadow dissolving Will you cleanse me with pleasure? совру если скажу что слип токен не вдохновляет меня на арты с малышами @hihiimchris 😼
custom 53598344720259621767custom 53980701735654599415custom 53594166404275400642
ой девочкиии 🗣 не понравились мне ваши эти flat colors больше надеюсь не возьмут адопта тоже не взяли, думаю редизайнить тогда......
custom 54606774780475540906custom 53594166404275400644custom 52558311173988250102
у меня эт самое день рождения, можете репостнуть арты и тд☺️
custom 53980701735654599414
@hihiimchris я не знаю как это вышло 😳
custom 53598344720259621764custom 54606774780475540903custom 53594166404275400642
первый выходной за пару дней вышел продуктивно (я не знаю зачем я взялась за стилус 🙂🙂🙂)
custom 53598344720259621765custom 53594166404275400643custom 52558311173988250102custom 54606774780475540901
какие-то каракули ночные @killminstrel @hihiimchris 😳
custom 54606774780475540904custom 53598344720259621763custom 53980701735654599412
не знаю купят ли эту принцессу, но вам тоже покажу 😌
custom 54606774780475540908custom 53594166404275400644custom 53598344720259621762
пачечка ючиков... такие чудесные персонажи попались я просто в шоках 😭
custom 54606774780475540909custom 53598344720259621765custom 53980701735654599413custom 53594166404275400641
😱
custom 54606774780475540909custom 53594166404275400645custom 53598344720259621764
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @blednoenow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,002,578 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“blednoe [16+]” (@blednoenow), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blednoenow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.