переезд на новый канал https://t.me/htmllmm мью наново предлагайте
custom 52831561889622484553custom 52853523474746118331
Channel
@bleblebleblebleeb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
88subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002535024202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bleblebleblebleeb |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bleblebleblebleeb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 88 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 89 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 89 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
562 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5285352347474611833 | 178 | 31.7% | |
| custom 5283156188962248455 | 164 | 29.2% | |
| 🕊 | 142 | 25.3% | |
| custom 5375310261395672457 | 42 | 7.47% | |
| custom 5226834423088963480 | 33 | 5.87% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.534% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bleblebleblebleeb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 10 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
переезд на новый канал https://t.me/htmllmm мью наново предлагайте
custom 52831561889622484553custom 52853523474746118331
Channel photo removed
завтра в три выйду из запоя
🕊14custom 528535234747461183310custom 52831561889622484558
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 528535234747461183317🕊12custom 528315618896224845512
первый пошел
custom 528315618896224845517custom 528535234747461183313🕊11
быстро оперативно скетчевые реквесты условия:: · репост · подписка · скинуть в комментарии персонажа и, если хотите, пожелания
custom 52853523474746118338🕊6custom 52831561889622484555
о боже у меня заказывают кмм
custom 528535234747461183316custom 528315618896224845514🕊13
коллаб с @Pls_ubeite
custom 528535234747461183317custom 528315618896224845510🕊8
на дтиус
custom 528535234747461183321custom 528315618896224845516🕊14
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 528535234747461183318🕊15custom 528315618896224845515
коммишки на картинке расписаны цены на полнооценки и скетчи. оплата тг звездами. писать — @rtaburetka доплата:: сложный фон (со сложной перспективой, архитектурой) +30 средний фон (не сильная детализация, пейзажи, абстракция) +15 простой фон (заливка, узоры) - бесплатно за ещё одного персонажа +100% предоплата после отправки скетча дедлайн месяц не рисую:: детей, пожилых, очень мускулистых персонажей, реальных люде…
🕊14custom 528535234747461183311custom 528315618896224845510custom 53753102613956724573
Video, posted without a caption
custom 528315618896224845512custom 52853523474746118337🕊6custom 53753102613956724572
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bleblebleblebleeb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 832,797 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bleblebleblebleeb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“archive” (@bleblebleblebleeb), 88 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bleblebleblebleeb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.