Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for book community

Channel

book community

@blccommunity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

38subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002484787258
TypeChannel
Username@blccommunity
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/blccommunity

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

34383618 September 2026 — 35 subscribers18 September 2026 — 35 subscribers30 September 2026 — 34 subscribers16 October 2026 — 35 subscribers6 November 2026 — 38 subscribers18 September 20266 November 2026
5 measurements spanning 49 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:1438+3
16 Oct 2026, 16:3735+1
30 Sept 2026, 01:3634-1
18 Sept 2026, 14:2235no change
18 Sept 2026, 13:4735first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2893.3%
🙏26.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 11:39 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

«Тайная история» - Донна Тартт 🍵 В этом месяце погрузимся в более современную литературу! Блестящая американская писательница Донна Тартт, лауреат Пулитцеровской премии 2014 года, покорила читателей в 1992 году первым же своим романом "Тайная история". Книга сразу стала бестселлером. Она переведена на двадцать четыре языка и продолжает расходиться многомиллионными тиражами во всем мире. Действие происходит в неболь…

❤3

16 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTC20 viewsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Выбираем книгу🗞️ (описания можно прочесть в комментах под прошлым постом)

  1. «Конец детства»43%
  2. «Письма Баламута»43%
  3. «Ставок больше нет»29%
  4. «Цветы для Элджернона»29%
  5. «Тюремная исповедь»43%
  6. «Тайная история»71%

The shares total 258%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Пришло время выбрать книгу из серии классической литературы для чтения на следующий месяц⭐️ Можете написать свои предложения в комментарии (если ещё и напишете о чем книга, будет выше шанс, что за нее проголосует большинство)🙏🏽

❤3

15 Sept 2026, 06:35 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

В минувшее воскресенье состоялась встреча нашего книжного клуба🕶 Наконец-то обсудили «на музыке» Левитина! В ходе обсуждения вынесли для себя очень интересные моменты: -мозг разбирает музыку, а потом снова собирает её -у нас в голове нет единого «музыкального центра», за различные ноты и тональности отвечают разные части мозга -то, понравилась нам песня/музыка или нет, зависит от того, оправдались ли наши ожидания, …

❤3

12 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC31 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Встречаемся 13.09 в 16:30 в Этлон кофе в «Valo»❤️ Обсудим нашу прочитанную книгу за чашечкой кофе/чая в приятной компании! *ребятам из других городов отправлю ссылку на встречу в ZOOM, чтобы вы смогли подключиться

❤4🙏2

10 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTC32 viewsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Встречаемся 13 числа, выбираем время 👍🏽

  1. 16:30-18:3025%
  2. 17:30-19:3075%
  3. 18:30-20:3025%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC35 viewsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Выбираем дату встречи 🤞🏽

  1. 1225%

Shares as published, totalling 25%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

«На музыке» - Дэниел Левитин Автор исследует связь между музыкой — ее исполнением, сочинением, тем, как мы ее слушаем, тем, что нам в ней нравится, — и человеческим мозгом. Вступая в диалог с выдающимися мыслителями, которые утверждают, что музыка не более чем эволюционная случайность, Левитин заявляет, что она фундаментальное свойство нашего вида. На протяжении большей части человеческой истории во всем мире сочин…

❤3

8 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

сегодня у нас было книжное дуо📚 если честно, мы обе были в шоке с концовки книги, это было непредсказуемо! безумно понравилось то, что сам детектив читался очень легко, на одном дыхании. в течение рассказа героя ты задаешься множеством вопросов, много кого подозреваешь, а с каждой последующей страницей находишь ответы и тут же уже меняешь свое представление о том, кто совершил убийство. ставим 10/10🌸

❤2

7 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC163 views4 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

встречаемся 8 августа в 13:00 в парадоксе за чашечкой кофе для обсуждения убийства Роджера Экройда, наконец узнаем, кто же это сделал и зачем⁉️

❤4

3 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC47 viewsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Встречаемся 9 августа, выбираем время 🫂

  1. 12:00-14:0025%
  2. 13:00-15:0075%
  3. 14:00-16:0075%
  4. 15:00-17:0025%
  5. 16:00-18:0025%
  6. 17:00-19:0025%

The shares total 250%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC39 viewsread 18 September 2026
Poll

Выбираем день встречи🙏🏽

  1. 833%

Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @blccommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Выбираем книгу🗞️ (описания можно прочесть в комментах под прошлым постом)

  1. «Конец детства»43%
  2. «Письма Баламута»43%
  3. «Ставок больше нет»29%
  4. «Цветы для Элджернона»29%
  5. «Тюремная исповедь»43%
  6. «Тайная история»71%

The shares total 258%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Встречаемся 13 числа, выбираем время 👍🏽

  1. 16:30-18:3025%
  2. 17:30-19:3075%
  3. 18:30-20:3025%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Выбираем дату встречи 🤞🏽

  1. 1225%

Shares as published, totalling 25%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Встречаемся 9 августа, выбираем время 🫂

  1. 12:00-14:0025%
  2. 13:00-15:0075%
  3. 14:00-16:0075%
  4. 15:00-17:0025%
  5. 16:00-18:0025%
  6. 17:00-19:0025%

The shares total 250%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Выбираем день встречи🙏🏽

  1. 833%

Shares as published, totalling 33%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Выбираем детективчик🫵🏽

  1. «Рассказы об отце Брауне» Гилберт Кит Честертон33%
  2. «Молчание ягнят» Томас Харрис33%

Shares as published, totalling 66%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“book community” (@blccommunity), 38 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blccommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.