3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 526–527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 04:01
527
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:13
527
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:27
526
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 527 subscribers
Avg views / post
178
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
9 (29 May 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
178
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
134
Links
44
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5424972470023104089
28
24.8%
custom 5456140674028019486
27
23.9%
custom 5469770542288478598
24
21.2%
custom 5276032951342088188
14
12.4%
custom 5276289730256842699
8
7.08%
custom 5431895003821513760
6
5.31%
custom 5470173702278622823
5
4.42%
custom 5472309400536358507
1
0.885%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Akin to an inspired Mortisan, I'm experimenting with Ossiarch models in an attempt to bring out their animalistic side. My warband will originate from the Realm of Beasts and beings constructed out of the remains of Ghur's wild creatures should look fittingly ferocious.
🦴 #Vertebraic_Emporium
#Warhammer #AoS #Warcry #miniature #conversion #WIP
📱 VK 📱 IG 📱 AS 📱 BG 📱 TG
⠀
Finished up several more gnoblars led by their wolf-riding chieftain. These puny greenskins seem strangely absent from the upcoming ogre refresh, but I now have just enough for a small Warcry warband. These were converted from random Warhammer minis while we wait for the Mawtribes army set to hit the pre-orders.
🍗 #Scattered_Skal
#Warhammer #AoS #Warcry #fantasy #miniature #conversion
📱 VK 📱 IG 📱 AS 📱 BG 📱 TG
I have cut out a set of printable Age of Sigmar objective templates out of Spearhead boards. All three sets released to date are included:
⠀🔥🌱⠀Fire and Jade
⠀🪦🪦⠀Sand and Bone
⠀🗺🗺⠀City of Ash
Ready to print for use in your games of AoS, Spearhead and Warcry. Download the file and get going!
#Warhammer #AoS #Spearhead #Warcry #download
📱 VK 📱 IG 📱 AS 📱 BG 📱 TG
⠀
Making up imagined crimes where there are no real ones to be found is a common practice in the Inquisition. Little wonder that some operatives extend these methods even to themselves:
𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗟𝗘 🪽 ΨE-0204932
🌫𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Sefina
🌫𝗧𝗶𝘁𝗹𝗲𝘀: Penitent Mother, Questkeeper-Solum
🌫𝗢𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻: Hara Praya (α)
🌫𝗔𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: Howling Hermithage, Solarium Teraklis
🌫𝗣𝘀𝗶-𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲: Pi
🌫𝗩𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲: +Scream! Deafen these traitorous whisper…
👍 Приглашаем в лучшие
👌 TG каналы про
👌 🎲🎲🎲
👌 и близкие к нему темы!
Интересный и разнообразный контент:
🤩 Информационные каналы
🧑🔬 Аудиконтент (музыка и аудиокниги)
👽 Коллекционные аксессуары и миньки
🤨 Игровые каналы и чаты
💅 Арты от художников
🤨 Роспись миниатюр
💥 Мемы и прочий юмор
👾 Тематические и авторские каналы и чаты
И многое другое - всё что нужно настоящему…
What 40k armies need substantial model updates in 11E?
🧍 Astra Militarum18%
ℹ️ Imperial Agents21%
📖 Grey Knights50%
☸️ Chaos Daemons25%
💫 Thousand Sons23%
🌍 World Eaters21%
👶 Emperor's Children23%
🌑 Drukhari30%
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The galaxy bleeds anew with the release of 11th edition of Warhammer 40000. Let's get the discussion going in style with the updated emojipacks full of iconorgaphy for the factions of the grim darkness of the far future:
✨ Add Warhammer 40k emojipack ✨
ℹ️ ⚙️ ☠️ ☸️ 🦠 🧝 ⚰️ 🌏 🤢 🦐
✨ Add 40k Factions emojipack ✨
🪽🪽🧍☠️⚙️👶🧝🩸⚰️🦐🦅🐙
These are perfect for proclaiming your faction allegiance, organizing tournament brackets …
Time to expand my Underworlds set into a Warcry warband. A fast melee beatstick seems useful, so here's an Icefall Yhetee Wardog Workshop printed for me. His name is Skeggi, treat him nicely!
🍗 #Scattered_Skal
#Warhammer #AoS #Warcry #fantasy #miniature #3Dprint
📱 VK 📱 IG 📱 AS 📱 BG 📱 TG
⠀
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @blastedhorizons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What 40k armies need substantial model updates in 11E?
🧍 Astra Militarum18%
ℹ️ Imperial Agents21%
📖 Grey Knights50%
☸️ Chaos Daemons25%
💫 Thousand Sons23%
🌍 World Eaters21%
👶 Emperor's Children23%
🌑 Drukhari30%
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 757,815 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blasted Horizons | Хобби-блог по Warhammer” (@blastedhorizons), 527 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blastedhorizons.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
