открыт набор в клан, подробности в закрепе 🤩
🍓6☃2👍1

Channel
@blastcommunity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
174subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002089211845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blastcommunity |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 1 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blastcommunity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 174 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 174 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
243 reactions across 19 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 25.5% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5325733784610422221 | 28 | 11.5% | |
| custom 6095692979786222527 | 28 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 9.05% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 5.76% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 3.29% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.29% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5379927407073434513 | 6 | 2.47% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 2.47% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.06% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.823% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 0.412% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 1.23% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2024 to 6 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
открыт набор в клан, подробности в закрепе 🤩
🍓6☃2👍1
🤩BLAST FAMILY - открыт набор в кланы DEMONS и DYNASTY ⭐️Мы клан, собирающий разных людей по странам, религиям, национальностям, но остающийся, как одна единая семья. 🤩по вступлению можно писать @triplestrixgods
❤🔥5💋4🏆3😍1
✨✨✨ Happy birthday ✨✨✨ ✨ BLAST FAMILY ✨ 🤩сегодня нашему клану исполняется ровно год!!! 🤍от лица администрации клана я поздравляю всех с этим прекрасным днем!!! 🤩BLAST - это не обычный клан, это больше - это одна большая семья. 🤩 спасибо большое можно сказать Лизе и Владу, за что открыли и держали этот клан под контролем и не давали упасть и пропасть. 🤍 не без внимания наша администра…
❤🔥9🍾7💋6😍3☃1🍌1💅1💘1
🤩 в настоящий момент у нас открыт набор в два клана, подробности и критерии можно узнать @ia_rishka blast family- это больше чем обычный клан 🤩
❤🔥8❤5😍3💘2🙉2💅1
🤩 в настоящий момент у нас открыт набор в два клана, подробности и критерии можно узнать @ia_rishka blast family- это больше чем обычный клан 🤩
🔥5custom 53257337846104222215❤🔥4💘1🙊1
люблю 💗
❤🔥6❤4👍2🌭1custom 53257337846104222211
жалуются и жалуются 🙄
custom 53257337846104222217❤3❤🔥3🌭1🍌1🎃1
мои любимые, спасибо за поддержку и помощь, вы лучшие 🤩
❤6💋2🔥2
вторая часть наших любимых парней 🦋 также у нас открыт набор @ia_rishka
❤🔥9❤3custom 53257337846104222213
наш счастливый день 🥳
custom 60956929797862225277❤🔥4🔥3
🤩наши дорогие и прекрасные парни, на подходе уже 2 часть. 🤩также у нас открыт набор в клан, писать можно @ia_rishka
❤🔥9🔥6custom 60956929797862225276
наши любимые девочки🤩 🤩 также у нас открыт набор в клан, писать можно @ia_rishka
❤🔥4❤2🔥2😍1custom 53257337846104222211custom 60956929797862225271
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blastcommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,285,914 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blastcommunity named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BLAST FAMILY” (@blastcommunity), 174 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blastcommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.