Channel
@blast_france
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
637subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001546461483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blast_france |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blast_france |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 637 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 634 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 631 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 630 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,830 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Prisons françaises : pourquoi ça va exploser ? Pour comprendre les causes de cette crise, ses conséquences et les solutions envisageables, Blast reçoit Dominique Simonnot, contrôleuse générale des lieux de privation de liberté, qui répond à nos questions sur l'état des prisons françaises et les enjeux démocratiques et humains que soulève la surpopulation carcérale. › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
❤1
« Ils nous terrorisent par tous les moyens possibles » : à Jérusalem-Est, le nettoyage ethnique des Palestiniens continue À Jérusalem-Est, les Palestiniens vivent au rythme des démolitions de maisons, des expulsions forcées et des violences terroristes commises par des colons israéliens. Reportage sur place. Par Elsa Galland. › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
😡2😱1
Pourquoi et comment devient on juge La soif de justice est immense, mais l’ignorance de ce que font réellement les magistrat·es l’est tout autant. Ce documentaire leur donne le temps de nous raconter leur métier, la difficulté de juger, les coulisses de la justice. Dans une période où les juges sont ouvertement méprisés par les politiques, les États de droit gangrenés par des régimes autoritaires, les droits…
❤1👍1
📣 Blast est ravi d'être partenaire du Cabaret Vert 2026 ! Rendez-vous du 20 au 23 août à Charleville-Mézières pour quatre jours d'engagements, de débats et de musique ! 🎟️ Découvrez toute la programmation et réservez vos places ici : › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
👍2
« Permis de tuer » : comment un pays glisse vers le fascisme Dans cette chronique, on retrace l'histoire de cette idée : d'un programme d'extrême droite en 2007 jusqu'au vote du 7 juillet 2026, en passant par la doctrine coloniale du maintien de l'ordre, le 17 octobre 1961, la mort de Nahel Merzouk en 2023, et cinquante ans de mobilisation des quartiers populaires pour empêcher que ce texte existe. Par @ibrahim_b…
« Les oligarques nous font croire à une pseudo démocratie » Félix Marquardt est difficile à cerner. On l’a vu faire son come back sur les réseaux sociaux autour de Gaza et du chiffrage des morts qu’il trouve -arguments à l’appui- nettement sous évalué. Son parcours -et sa fiche Wikipédia en témoigne- est sinueux et alambiqué. Présenté comme consultant et essayiste, il est aussi journaliste, communiquant et surtou…
🤣2
Jusqu'ici tout va mal - Juillet 2026 Sous forme de bloc-notes, chronique au fil des jours d'un monde en débâcle. À retrouver tous les mois. Par Sébastien Fontenelle et Yan Lindingre. › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir l'article
Le ministère du Travail fait la guerre aux inspecteurs À Grenoble, deux inspecteurs du travail et représentants syndicaux sont visés par une procédure disciplinaire, malgré le classement sans suite des procédures pénales engagées contre eux. Dans ce nouveau Focus, Blast enquête sur une affaire qui interroge l’indépendance de l’inspection du travail et le fonctionnement même de l'Etat. › Ouvrir sur X | Ouvrir …
🔥3
Détruire le "grand Satan marxiste" : plongée dans une secte d'extrême droite Ils rêvaient de trouver la pierre philosophale pour éradiquer le communisme. C'est l'histoire d'une secte d'alchimistes installée en Auvergne dans les années 1980. Racisme, xénophobie, retour à la nature, complotisme, rigorisme religieux, obsession d’un ennemi commun : un cocktail idéologique qui résonne sans surprise avec l’extrême-droi…
👏1
Blast victime d’une contrefaçon. Avant hier, dans la soirée, nous avons été alerté d’un article attribué à un de nos pigistes et au contenu mensonger concernant Léa Salamé et son conjoint, publié sur les réseaux sociaux qui proviendrait du site de Blast. Cet article est issu d’un faux site ayant copié et reproduit les informations de notre site internet 181 pages copiées à l’identique et une seule fabriquée, le fa…
😱1
Blast victime d’une contrefaçon. Avant hier, dans la soirée, nous avons été alerté d’un article attribué à un de nos pigistes et au contenu mensonger concernant Léa Salamé et son conjoint, publié sur les réseaux sociaux qui proviendrait du site de Blast. Cet article est issu d’un faux site ayant copié et reproduit les informations de notre site internet 181 pages copiées à l’identique et une seule fabriquée, le fa…
👍1
A reposté → @BlasterJules: « Cher Jean-Philippe Tanguy » Boxing Day #90 « La pratique du double discours opportuniste est une caractéristique générale de votre engagement politique, et relève même chez vous du registre de la performance artistique. » Via @blast_france 🧵 › Ouvrir sur X
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blast_france. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 484,571 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blast_france named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BLAST” (@blast_france), 637 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blast_france.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.