Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[закрыто.]ᴏбɜᴏᴩщиᴋ Бᴧ϶йд. || ОКМ.

@bladeokm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

67subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002606841126
TypeChannel
Username@bladeokm
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 19 June 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bladeokm

Growth

6712 Aug 2026, 19:18 — 67 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 05:46 — 67 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:1813 Aug 2026, 05:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66–68 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:4667no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:1867first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘3517.5%
💋3417.0%
🔥3115.5%
2412.0%
🍓2010.0%
🕊199.50%
❤‍🔥94.50%
🙏94.50%
custom 518823928432639619473.50%
custom 547004168786885526873.50%
🐳52.50%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 20 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bladeokm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2025 to 20 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2025, 18:19 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[закрыто.]ᴏбɜᴏᴩщиᴋ Бᴧ϶йд. || ОКМ.»

20 Aug 2025, 18:16 UTC618 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

здравствуйте, сегодня в столь замечательный светлый день я сообщаю вам мои любимые об одной новости. для кого-то возможно это новость хорошая, для кого-то грустная, но слава богу не плачевная новость. для этого канала наступил конец. я устал вести канал. мне надоело, что многие буквально даже не читают посты, что я выкладываю. меня никак не мотивирует мертвый актив. я уже не знаю как обращаться с вами. со временем вс

🕊10💘5🙏51❤‍🔥1

18 Aug 2025, 09:35 UTC412 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

검토 || NEW REVIEW ;; @bladeokm . . прежде всего прошу вас ознакомиться с данным отрывком до конца. Хочу подчеркнуть, что я не умаляю ценность чужого труда — всё изложено исключительно объективно и справедливо. У меня нет предпочтений или предвзятости к кому-либо. Рассчитываю на ваше понимание. —— ((⬆️)) —— предупреждение. доброго времени, мои дорогие подписчики. приятного прочтения каждому зрителю на канале. 01. Инфор

🍓4💘32🕊2❤‍🔥1🐳1

2 Aug 2025, 19:05 UTC515 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

검토 || NEW REVIEW ;; @bladeokm . . прежде всего прошу вас ознакомиться с данным отрывком до конца. Хочу подчеркнуть, что я не умаляю ценность чужого труда — всё изложено исключительно объективно и справедливо. У меня нет предпочтений или предвзятости к кому-либо. Рассчитываю на ваше понимание. —— ((⬆️)) —— предупреждение. доброго времени, мои дорогие подписчики. приятного прочтения каждому зрителю на канале. 01. Инфор

4🔥4❤‍🔥2🍓2💘2💋1

23 Jul 2025, 14:05 UTC490 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Для начала прошу вас прочитать данный открыток до конца. Я не оскорбляю чужой флуд, все пишется строго по справедливости. У меня нет любимчиков чтобы я их обделял. Надеюсь на понимание.🩸 ——— 1. Инфо - https://t.me/+jgEdnhIONj1mYmIy » посты написаны хорошо, когда читал правила честное слово был готов застрелиться, прошу прощения я просто не готов был читать такой список правил, чуток. оформление хромает, сове

custom 51882392843263961947🍓6🔥3💋2🕊21

12 Jul 2025, 15:11 UTC551 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КРАШ ЛИСТ. от блэйда. . . порядок и нумерация не имеют значения в данном посте. благодарю ! @wiaumell , @Stira_s_home , @Okmaxyelu , @ll_Milk_422 , @porthelen , @lynnport , @huilablutt , @question_aventurine , @lalalalalalalqa . . . так же прошу не обижаться, если вас нет в списке. ме.

7💘3🔥2💋1

12 Jul 2025, 14:48 UTC475 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Для начала прошу вас прочитать данный открыток до конца. Я не оскорбляю чужой флуд, все пишется строго по справедливости. У меня нет любимчиков чтобы я их обделял. Надеюсь на понимание.🩸 у тартальи, камина и итера очень красивые профиля, спасибо за внимание. (я бы дал. ПРОСТИТП, МНЕ НАДО БЫЛО ЭТО ДОБАВИТЬ.) ——— 1. Инфо - @INFOTheWhitePearl » посты написаны понятно и хорошо, мне понравилась их навигация, банн

💘4💋2🔥21❤‍🔥1🐳1

9 Jul 2025, 11:52 UTC439 views19 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Для начала прошу вас прочитать данный открыток до конца. Я не оскорбляю чужой флуд, все пишется строго по справедливости. У меня нет любимчиков чтобы я их обделял. Надеюсь на понимание.🩸 ——— 1. Инфо - @infoemeraldforest » посты в инфо написаны легко и понятно, все быстро читается. правила написаны понятно, кодовое слово видно сразу. Что насчет оформления постов? советую немного поработать над баннерами и ава

💋74❤‍🔥4🐳2💘1🔥1

5 Jul 2025, 18:41 UTC487 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Для начала прошу вас прочитать данный открыток до конца. Я не оскорбляю чужой флуд, все пишется строго по справедливости. У меня нет любимчиков чтобы я их обделял. Надеюсь на понимание.🩸 на данный момент флуд находится в ресте. ——— 1. Инфо - @stawratti_info » посты написаны понятно и понять с первого раза можно, чему я рад. оформление очень красивое, все красиво и легко украшено, есть крутые кружочки с Герто

💘6💋4🔥3🙏3🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bladeokm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,291,179 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[закрыто.]ᴏбɜᴏᴩщиᴋ Бᴧ϶йд. || ОКМ.” (@bladeokm), 67 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bladeokm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.