Channel
@blacktraffi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001445847195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blacktraffi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 27 April 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blacktraffi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 165 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 167 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 169 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 169 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Многие спрашивают почему перестал вести канал? Раньше смысл вести его был в наработке связей, контактов и поиске партнеров на отработку FB. Все задачи были закрыты еще в начале 22 года, так-как работали с оптовиками и объемами, которые превышали наши возможности в десятки раз. Проработав год с безграничным кол-вом трафика мы сильно выросли, набрались опыта работы с FB и в начале 23 года, когда партнер сообщил о пр…
+7.300$🔥 Подбил цифры за 22 год, в сумме слили больше 1млн$. На днях напишу пост, что сейчас проходит в команде )
+32.300$ Топовый баер отработал лог для клиента. Сливали 3 недели так-как уперлись в дневные лимиты
▪️ВЫЖМЕМ МАКСИМУМ ИЗ ТВОИХ ЛОГОВ FACEBOOK 💎- Выкупаем или берем на отработку логи facebook .com 💎- Прогоним чекером любой объём логов. Предоставим прозрачный отчет и статистику результатов чека. 💎- Выкупаем уникальные логи с личных проливов. Биржевые берём по фикс прайсу. 💎- Топовый сервис. Ветки с отзывами на exploit и wwh Что бы мы видели, что пишите по поводу фб, начинайте диалог с хештега #olegfb ◾️КОНТАКТЫ…
+4.600$
+8.350$ Мы работаем и каждый месяц отливаем стабильно 70к$+💎
+3.600$ Мы льём на свои проекты, поэтому запускаем все логи без банов и фрода со стороны ФБ
+5.500$ У первого лога биллинг аккаунта был менее 15$. У второго биллинга не было, только привязанная платёжка. Выжимаем любые логи на максимум💎
+2.600$
ВЫЖМЕМ МАКСИМУМ ИЗ ТВОИХ ЛОГОВ FACEBOOK -Выкупаем или берем на отработку логи facebook .com -Прогоним чекером любой объём логов. Предоставим прозрачный отчет и статистику по результатам чека. -Выкупаем только уникальные логи с личных проливов или с минимальным кол-вом гостей. Биржевые берём на отработку. Что бы мы видели что пишите по поводу фб, начинайте диалог с хештега #fb КОНТАКТЫ ДЛЯ СВЯЗИ: Менеджер - @mrstaf…
+3.650$ Начальный биллинг лога 25$
+1.850$ Начальный биллинг лога был 15$. Выжимаем максимум даже из логов с низким биллингом
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @blacktraffi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,470 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OLEG KV | Черный трафик” (@blacktraffi), 165 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacktraffi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.