🖤 Прямые эфиры Blackpink на годовщину через года @blackpink_bpm
💘3❤2👏1💋1
Signed Кии Юʍиᴄᴏᴧь-ю୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ

Channel
@blackpink_bpm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003576741655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blackpink_bpm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blackpink_bpm |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 96 | -1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 97 | -8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 105 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 107 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 115 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 114 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
61 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 23.0% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5785425903827820093 | 10 | 16.4% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5237946070419399299 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| custom 5328156399568436896 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| custom 5386789205739336588 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5784991832958050324 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5229023945876860546 | 1 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤 Прямые эфиры Blackpink на годовщину через года @blackpink_bpm
💘3❤2👏1💋1
Signed Кии Юʍиᴄᴏᴧь-ю୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ
🩷 Blackpink вышли в совместный прямой эфир в честь десятилетия с дебюта Ссылка -> https://weverse.io/blackpink/live/2-178873994 @blackpink_bpm
❤2💋1💘1
Signed Кии Юʍиᴄᴏᴧь-ю୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ
🖤 YG опубликовали поздравительное видео в честь годовщины Blackpink -> https://youtu.be/k--lCrP69hg?si=qFZpo3rsmE1hois5 @blackpink_bpm
❤3💋1
Signed Кии Юʍиᴄᴏᴧь-ю୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ
Привет ребятки!!!! Сначала я хочу извиниться за неактив! Простите пожалуйста за пустоту на канале! А теперь хочу поздравить вас всех с 🤩🤩 группы Balckpink🤩 Я очень скучаю по тем девочкам которые выпускали совместный контент 10 лет назад, а также мне нравятся соло девочек 😍 Поздравляю всех блинков 👏
❤2💘2
Signed Кии Юʍиᴄᴏᴧь-ю୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ
Ребята, Если вы хотите чтобы канал остался, то Назовите своих друзей, если хотите не заставляю, активте побольше реакции ставьте, больше просмотров делайте, мне реально обидно что никто не ставит реакции на канал, просмотров один, это вы показываете свой неактив.😭
😢3
Это в любом случае
😢2
Ребята Если вы будете показывать не актив то мне придётся закрыть канал
😢2❤1👏1
Ребята что это за актив давайте вы будете ставить реакции на посты больше просмотров пожалуйста хотя бы 26 или Ну не один
❤3
📸 — Лису видели в торговом центре, играющей с другими детьми 🥰 🖤 @blackpink_bpm
custom 57854259038278200933❤1💘1custom 52290239458768605461
Signed ∴ᐥ⋰𝓙𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪⋱༞ ᵒʷⁿ ᵇˡᵏᶠˡʷ
// Info // Обновление инстаграма Лисы с её мамой 🤏❤️🩹 🖤 @blackpink_bpm
💘2custom 57849918329580503242custom 52379460704193992991custom 53281563995684368961
Signed ∴ᐥ⋰𝓙𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪⋱༞ ᵒʷⁿ ᵇˡᵏᶠˡʷ
🛎️ — Обновление инста-сторис Лисы. 🖤 @blackpink_bpm
custom 57854259038278200935💘2custom 52379460704193992991custom 53281563995684368961
Signed ∴ᐥ⋰𝓙𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪⋱༞ ᵒʷⁿ ᵇˡᵏᶠˡʷ
Лиса была упомянута ANYMA в интервью для Rolling Stone Korea: Q: Перед первой неделей Coachella вы выпустили "BAD ANGEL" — вашу совместную работу с Лисой из BLACKPINK. Как вы с ней впервые познакомились, и что в Лисе заставило вас почувствовать, что она идеально подходит для этой песни? ANYMA: Лиса — артистка с очень четким видением своей работы, при этом невероятно разносторонняя. В "BAD ANGEL" она не просто добав…
custom 53867892057393365882💘1custom 52379460704193992991
Signed ∴ᐥ⋰𝓙𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓪⋱༞ ᵒʷⁿ ᵇˡᵏᶠˡʷ
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @blackpink_bpm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝑳𝒊𝒔𝒂” (@blackpink_bpm), 96 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackpink_bpm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.