Channel
@blacklight_piercing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002178667208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blacklight_piercing |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blacklight_piercing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 499 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 499 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (9 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,210 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
219 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5346089481462095285 | 57 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5224424151866941199 | 43 | 19.6% | |
| custom 5370677336008044128 | 33 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5343563203173427001 | 32 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5220099476282160681 | 27 | 12.3% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 11.4% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.457% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.457% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐰 Редкий, но меткий Показываю уникальное — заживший флэт 🥺 Почему данное событие столь редкое узнать можно туть 👈 Мучались мы больше полугода (что не так уж и много для капризных проколов, бывает и хуже), но в итоге победили 👏 Нарядили в золотой подсолнух и радуемся жизни 🌻 #ухо #украшения
👏4custom 52200994762821606814custom 52244241518669411994
🫦 Вертикальный лабрет Большинством людей воспринимается как самый болезненный из проколов губ 🥲 Но у нас тут сверхчеловек, которая оценила данную процедуру на 3/10 😮 Что еще раз показывает нам разнообразие индивидуальных ощущений и болевых порогов Штош, осталось зажить и сделать даунсайз 👍 #губы
custom 522009947628216068111👏6custom 52244241518669411995custom 53460894814620952851
🦇 I'm Batman Посадили вот такую очаровательную летучую мышку в хеликс 🦇 #ухо #украшения
custom 537067733600804412812custom 52200994762821606817custom 52244241518669411993👏2
⭐️⭐️ Двойная мочка Подарок от жены на годовщину свадьбы в виде проколов 💜 Очень приятно, когда люди отмечают подобные события пирсингом. Такая боди модификация — это то, что остаётся с тобой если не навсегда, то в любом случае надолго Спасибо за доверие и желаю продолжения семейного счастья 😌 #уши
custom 534356320317342700113custom 53460894814620952855custom 52244241518669411994👏1custom 52200994762821606811
🥰 Хвастаюсь очередным заживчиком Спустя месяц при соблюдении всех рекомендаций и стечении благоприятных внешних обстоятельств септум проходит первичное заживление 🙌 Он и хозяйка молодцы и получают в награду модный заострённый кликер! 😍🤘 #нос #украшения
custom 534608948146209528510custom 53706773360080441286custom 52200994762821606814
👌 МинимализЪм Мочка в лимонном анодировании 🍋 #ухо #анодирование
custom 53435632031734270018👏3custom 52244241518669411993🕊1🦄1
💜 Вертикальный хеликс и третья мочка Ещё одна прекрасная мочка и не менее прекрасный хрящ) Для обычного хеликса местечка маловато, поэтому его вертикальный собрат нас выручил 💜 Добавили магии фуксией и teal blurple 🩷💙 #ухо #анодирование
custom 53460894814620952859custom 53706773360080441286custom 52244241518669411995
😎 Мочки по-английски К нам пришла англоговорящая клиентка, было очень приятно попрактиковаться в языке с профессиональным жаргоном) Сделали 3й мочки в продолжение имеющихся проколов, а на 4е анатомия уже не позволяла Нашла нашу студию не абы где, а на реддите, где ей сказали, что мы самые офигенные 😎 Sending back hello to Reddit, thank you to whoever suggested us☺️ BodModLab and Ekaterina Raush's fame transcend …
custom 534608948146209528517custom 522442415186694119910custom 534356320317342700110
💣 Показываю заживчиков Септум прекрасно зажил и получил в награду кликер "Месяц" 🌙 Отлично сочетается с космической темой мантисов ⭐️ Ангельские клыки уже давно зажившие, обновили их шариками поменьше и маленькими опаловыми конусами 🥰 #нос #губы
custom 53706773360080441289custom 53460894814620952857custom 52244241518669411995👏2custom 53435632031734270011
👂 Вторая и третья мочка Роскошная анатомия мочки для множественных проколов: много мягкой ткани, хрящ далеко 😌 И чудесно сочетающийся выбор цветов для #анодирование — светло-голубой и блюрпл 😈 #ухо #purple_squad
custom 53460894814620952858👏7custom 52244241518669411994
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @blacklight_piercing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 260,586 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blacklight Piercing | Пирсинг в Москве” (@blacklight_piercing), 499 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacklight_piercing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.