Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tea'th

@blackTeaacold

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003384323789
TypeChannel
Username@blackTeaacold
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blackTeaacold

Growth

103104103.510 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 103 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:34 — 104 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:4611 Aug 2026, 13:34
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:34104+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:46103first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.1%
avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.9
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total685
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

448 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8719.4%
custom 52291741408831939057316.3%
custom 52423411190433338026013.4%
custom 5201779138662271963276.03%
custom 5456432495580969366265.80%
custom 5325629562934019077235.13%
custom 5217624604457064807214.69%
custom 5906827883208250487214.69%
custom 5332737351556800801153.35%
custom 5233398855399121038143.13%
custom 5244522455623556916143.13%
custom 5379775442540589404143.13%
custom 5312025769420034584102.23%
custom 546329483111776216781.79%
custom 587293575940460079381.79%
custom 534620110336717201371.56%
custom 529211144917746973361.34%
custom 529674123064905421251.12%
custom 524458269683484934540.893%
custom 524452305262401114830.67%
1 further kind20.446%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
317
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blackTeaacold. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC46 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

анимешка🤍🤍

12custom 58729357594046007934custom 52423411190433338023custom 52333988553991210381custom 52445224556235569161

4 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC64 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @KazuyaMinegishi_AbelPhoto

Первый такой масштабный коллаб Участники: @slagck @sink_legend @blackTeaacold И я Всем пасибо за участие!

4custom 54632948311177621673custom 52423411190433338022custom 52445826968348493451

29 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC95 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

чиловый парень

custom 54632948311177621675custom 587293575940460079331

28 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC101 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

хочу картошку фри ✈️

custom 52176246044570648076custom 52423411190433338023custom 523339885539912103821custom 52445224556235569161custom 58729357594046007931

25 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC117 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

я не попала под персонажа, получилась няшка🪽

custom 523339885539912103810custom 52921114491774697336custom 529674123064905421251custom 52423411190433338021custom 52445826968348493451

22 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC118 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

нас уже 100🥳 есть только старый арт,мб завтра скину арт 🌟

custom 5244522455623556916125custom 52423411190433338024custom 52445826968348493452custom 52333988553991210381

19 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC144 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

извиняюсь не полноценка, скоро коллабу скину 🌟

custom 545643249558096936684custom 52445230526240111483custom 52557582919333656522custom 52423411190433338021

15 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC165 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

люблю их🌟

custom 521762460445706480775custom 52291741408831939052

14 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC162 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

если любите чернуху как sally face, можете глянуть «война единорогов»🤩

custom 52176246044570648078custom 52423411190433338023custom 53327373515568008013custom 52017791386622719631custom 52291741408831939051

13 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC144 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

коммишка 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀

custom 524234111904333380210custom 52017791386622719633custom 590682788320825048731custom 54564324955809693661

12 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC134 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

забыла выложить в срок😭 с днём рождения свит эппл

custom 52423411190433338026custom 53256295629340190774custom 52017791386622719632custom 59068278832082504872custom 54564324955809693661

6 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC211 views13 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟саммер тайм, сааднэсс..

7custom 53327373515568008013custom 59068278832082504872custom 52291741408831939051

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blackTeaacold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 372,496 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tea'th” (@blackTeaacold), 104 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackTeaacold.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.