щеголяю перед вами парой лайнов и загадочно удаляюсь
custom 54473301241458951919custom 54608046906839032567custom 52197506733981118721custom 52673853095694975611

Channel
@bl00dtsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001682449043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bl00dtsh |
| Description | 🎴🍣🥟 |
| Created | 28 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bl00dtsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 78 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 78 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
181 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5460804690683903256 | 71 | 39.2% | |
| custom 5346310032327714172 | 42 | 23.2% | |
| custom 5447330124145895191 | 29 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5461015625117744506 | 15 | 8.29% | |
| custom 5309797402947899693 | 13 | 7.18% | |
| custom 5411198728948162386 | 9 | 4.97% | |
| custom 5219750673398111872 | 1 | 0.552% | |
| custom 5267385309569497561 | 1 | 0.552% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
щеголяю перед вами парой лайнов и загадочно удаляюсь
custom 54473301241458951919custom 54608046906839032567custom 52197506733981118721custom 52673853095694975611
поиск в тт убил
custom 53097974029478996938custom 53463100323277141726custom 54610156251177445063
стадик ночной
custom 544733012414589519112custom 546080469068390325610custom 53463100323277141724
а что со стилем 🤩
custom 546080469068390325615custom 534631003232771417212custom 54473301241458951915custom 54610156251177445061
утром все кто видел сделайте вид что вы в секретном клубе и знаете страшную тайну
custom 534631003232771417212
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54608046906839032569
всех дам поздравляю с днем эмансипации и борьбы за свои права где-то услышала, что любить и уважать себя — самая великая революция 🌟🌟🌟
custom 546080469068390325611custom 54473301241458951913
Channel photo updated
кристина сделала меганяшное
custom 53463100323277141728custom 54111987289481623868custom 54608046906839032565
икота икота... перейди .. на федота...
custom 54608046906839032567custom 54111987289481623861
большой фотодамп за вчера из всего и сразу 🐱
custom 546101562511774450611custom 54608046906839032567custom 53097974029478996935
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bl00dtsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 483,803 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“実験08” (@bl00dtsh), 78 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bl00dtsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.