Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 940–951 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 17:56
941
-2
6 Sept 2026, 20:36
943
-5
28 Aug 2026, 14:13
948
-1
21 Aug 2026, 01:35
949
-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:00
950
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:56
950
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
9
36.0%
👍
5
20.0%
🙏
4
16.0%
🎉
2
8.00%
👏
2
8.00%
😁
2
8.00%
🤔
1
4.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bizwadim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2025 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Помимо роликов, можно делать картинки через ИИ
Это еще проще
Чисто картинка
Парень 17 лет сделал для какого то бренда логотип за пару минут и получил 4к
ЧЕТЫРЕ ТЫСЯЧИ за картинку сгенерированную в ии 🤐
А таких брендов которым нужны логотипы, продвижение и прочее ВАГОН, еще на бирже публикуют каждый день по 5-10 заданий за оплату💳 заходи бери делай
Так же в шоке от бабулек которые делают максимально простые ролики сво…
Marvel наберите мне
буду новым супер героем
Ауф 😂
Делать деньги и создавать контент можно тут
Платформа грамотная
Прикиньте 70+ различных нейросетей в одном месте☕️
Обучение по каждой теме, как че куда и зачем (справиться даже ребенок и тот кто далек от этого всего)
Можно генерить карточки для валберис озон (заезженная тема)
Можно штопать ебейшие ролики как на производстве и зарабатывать на рекламе, партнерстве и т…
За ИИ ролики которые вы видели в инсте, тик ток, ютубе по 10-15 секунд люди готовы платить по 5к 🤙
Подобные ролики делаются 5-20 минут времени
А теперь посчитайте математику и время которое готовы уделять чтоб штамповать для блогов, брендов, подобные ролики ✅
50$=500$
Закончился третий сезон айрдропа кэтизен
Из вложенных 50$ получилось 10х
А именно 509$
Жирно однако
НО учитывая донат в бомби и капибару остается только верить в успешный успех)
А пока иду выводить и продавать свои иксы
Помните тут рассказывал вам о покупке стикеров BAYC на которых можно было флипануть? На данный момент минимальная цена стикеров телеграмм на @igloomarket 34 Тона
+-100$ (кстати тут можно будет nft от ноткоин продать)
Не те иксы что я предполагал) но все же можно подержать, а можно продать
Кстати подарки в телеграмм набрали большие обороты и некоторые люди заработали 10.000$ а то и 100.000$ 💵
Интересные времена…
Куплю карточки 💰
Информация для тех кто получил карточки от @notgames_bot
Отправляйте мне в личку скрин карточек @anwadim
Напишу за сколько могу купить)
Первый не пишу!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bizwadim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@bizwadim named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@capybomb named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@igloomarket named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРАБСКИЙ FLEX” (@bizwadim), 941 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bizwadim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
