$STRC is approaching $100 again

Channel
Bitcoin Duke Journal
@bitdukejournal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
423subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001161929625 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitdukejournal |
| Description | one of the few still posting through the cycle. early to emerging crypto trends, still following the established ones. AI × crypto, decentralized compute, onchain agents, etc. building, tweeting. X @bitcoinduke |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitdukejournal |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 423 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 423 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.40%
- avg views ÷ 423 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.2
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 183 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,930
- Videos
- ≈27
- Links
- ≈1,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
The assets under management of leveraged ETFs decreased by over $60 billion.
Telegram removed from the Apple App Store worldwide
just a bit more info on Strategy’s trades today Strategy sold 1,638 BTC worth $102 million today and used $81 million of it to repurchase $STRC
Citadel thinks most of the tech overheating has already been flushed out, especially after the heavy retail selling at the end of July retail net selling in semis and memory stocks was around 20x the two-year average, (which is pretty wild) with leverage and positioning now much lighter, Citadel expects fundamentals to matter again, volatility to cool, and the broader uptrend to continue
POAP is winding down end of an era. POAP was special and will be missed, but it’s nice knowing all the memories it gave us will live on forever onchain
Strategy: Selling BTC for 3 Consecutive Months
July (only 1 month!) Crypto Hacks Source
First Half of 2026: 38% Decrease in DeFi TVL, 42% Decrease in Layer 1 Market Size Binance Research reported that the on-chain market showed a general trend of contraction in the first half of 2026, with limited market changes The total DeFi TVL decreased by $43.4 billion (-38%), and the major Layer 1 market size decreased by $246.5 billion (-42%) The amount of ETH held in Ethereum spot ETFs decreased from over 6 m…
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senate has 5 days to pass the Crypto Clarity Act before leaving for summer recess. @WatcherGuru
could this be it? time to start selling BTC again?
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bitdukejournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Duke Journal” (@bitdukejournal), 423 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitdukejournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.