Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لوازم آرایشی بی تا

Channel

لوازم آرایشی بی تا

@bita_arayeshi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

541subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430884833
TypeChannel
Username@bita_arayeshi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bita_arayeshi

Growth

5415435426 August 2026 — 542 subscribers6 August 2026 — 542 subscribers15 August 2026 — 543 subscribers22 August 2026 — 541 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 541–543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:56541-2
15 Aug 2026, 08:16543+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:18542no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:24542first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.51%
avg views ÷ 541 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.1
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held18 (26 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total737
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
😐150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🚨 اگه هنوز کشیدن خط چشم برات سخته، این محصول قراره نظرتو عوض کنه… 😍🖤 چند بار خط چشمتو پاک کردی چون دو طرفش قرینه نبود؟ 😩 ✨ خط چشم استامپی Olibolla اومده تا فقط توی چند ثانیه، یه خط چشم مرتب و جذاب داشته باشی؛ حتی اگه حرفه‌ای نباشی! 💖 چرا عاشقش میشی؟ 🖤 طراحی استامپی برای کشیدن راحت‌تر دنباله خط چشم ✨ رنگدانه مشکی با پوشش مناسب 💧 استفاده آسان و سریع 🌸 مناسب استفاده روزانه و مهمونی ⏱️ صرفه‌جویی در زمان آرایش 😍 از ای

😐1

Signed Atash

4 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC46 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😱 بدون دکلره، بدون اکسیدان… فقط با یه شامپو رنگ! 🍒 دوست داری قبل از خرید، تست رنگ رو ببینی و از قیمت مطلع بشی؟ 😍 💬 فقط کلمه «دکسی» رو کامنت کن تا تست رنگ و قیمت برات ارسال بشه. 👇 ✨ چرا شامپو رنگ دکسی؟ 🌿 کاملاً گیاهی 🤍 بدون آسیب و خشکی مو 🎨 رنگی زیبا با ماندگاری مناسب (بسته به جنس مو و دفعات شستشو) 🧤 همراه دستکش، پیش‌بند و محافظ گوش 🖌️ دارای شانه مخصوص برای استفاده آسان 📝 روش استفاده: روی موی خشک بزن، ۴۵ دقیقه تا

Signed Atash

4 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC46 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 اشتباهی که خیلی‌ها بعد از اپیلاسیون انجام میدن، باعث خشکی و حساس شدن پوستشونه! 😳 اگه دوست داری بعد از اپیلاسیون، پوستت نرم، لطیف و بدون احساس کشیدگی بمونه، انتخاب وکس خیلی مهمه. 💚 وکس خشابی آلوئه‌ورا دنی وان | ۱۰۰ گرمی 🌿 ✨ چرا این وکس؟ 💚 حاوی عصاره آلوئه‌ورا برای کمک به آرامش پوست 💚 حاوی گلیسیرین و روغن زیتون برای کمک به حفظ رطوبت پوست 💚 کمک به جلوگیری از احساس خشکی بعد از اپیلاسیون 💚 مناسب انواع پوست، به‌ویژه پ

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

این دور چشم و هرجا دیدی دو تا دوتا بخر قیمت۳۹۵

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC54 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

کافیه به دونش و داشته باشیم

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC48 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

حالا با یه دستگاه کوچولو موچولو کل افتادگی و چین و چروک و صاف میکنه هایفو رسید با قیمت ویژه۹۸۵

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

دقیقاچین وچروک و‌میشه پوشوند ولی افتادگی پوست و نه

1

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC41 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

اولین جایی که سنت رو لو‌میده👇 چین و چروک نیست

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC43 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ژل ترمیم کننده لانبنا رسید قیمت۵۸۵

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC40 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ضدآفتاب سنتلا رسید قیمت۱۹۵۰

Signed Atash

3 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

ضدآفتاب سنتلا رسید اورجینال قیمت ۱۹۵۰

Signed Atash

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bita_arayeshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 462,472 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لوازم آرایشی بی تا” (@bita_arayeshi), 541 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bita_arayeshi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.