приветули🫶🏻 я буду по-тихонько возвращаюсь •к вам прибежала белочка🐿️ •сплела её за 2 дня, схема от олеси оценивайте её🍦
❤5
Signed веруня🌷

Channel
@biseri_x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001566623701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biseri_x |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biseri_x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 43 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 43 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5447625746744879896 | 15 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5247223466066719245 | 10 | 11.1% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5472256585323522641 | 9 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5470092785094765546 | 6 | 6.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5447247922766819142 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| custom 5445071418024800133 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5345860490985747758 | 1 | 1.11% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2024 to 29 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
приветули🫶🏻 я буду по-тихонько возвращаюсь •к вам прибежала белочка🐿️ •сплела её за 2 дня, схема от олеси оценивайте её🍦
❤5
Signed веруня🌷
всем привет! я опять появилась я хочу вам представить верблюда, я начала плести ещё в январе❄️, но только сегодня доплела как вы можете заметить цветочек и колечко выполнены в пастельных цветах(я люблю их) в честь моего дня рождения🫶🏻 схема от маруси оценивайте его в комментариях🌷
🤩5
Signed веруня🌷
приветик! месяц меня не было, я вернулась хочу представить вам мишку от токси оценивайте его реакциями
🔥4🤩2
Signed веруня🫶🏻
🥰
custom 54722565853235226416❤2
Signed веруня🫶🏻
давно меня не было😔 надо это исправлять, ну а я покажу вам спойлер 😻 я не плела примерно неделю, сейчас у меня появилось желание плести🎩
custom 54700927850947655466custom 52472234660667192451custom 53458604909857477581custom 54722565853235226411
Signed веруня🫶🏻
привет всем))) 🩵сегодня я хочу вам покажу маленькую работу🍉 🩵это пришелец от @beads_sofia сплела я его быстро, а результат очень красивый❤️ не знаю, что ещё писать) давайте просто оценим его реакциями:)
🤩3custom 54472479227668191423custom 54722565853235226412custom 52472234660667192451
Signed веруня🫶🏻
у, ваууу😮
custom 54476257467448798964
Signed веруня🫶🏻
оп, и фигурка новая появилась 🩵это была прекраснейшая розовая пантера, один человек даже угадал кто это❤️ 🩵плела её на тест микуши, поначалу не хотелось плести, но в процессе затянулась и сделала на одном дыхание 🩵фигурка плетётся легко, но тело я переплетала, так как в 1 ряду была ошибка😘 ну и по традиции оцениваем эту ами)
❤2custom 52472234660667192452
Signed веруня🫶🏻
приступаю🎀
❤1
Signed веруня🫶🏻
я решила эту фигурку оставить(возможно на выходных доплету) и начать тест❤️
❤1
Signed веруня🫶🏻
скинуть цвета?
❤2
Signed веруня🫶🏻
опоп, как обещала пишу пост❤️ это необычная работа черепашка ниндзя))))🎀 фигурка на тест прекрасной @biserinnka сама фигурка мне очень нравится🙂 оцените в комментариях и реакциямии😎
💋3🔥2custom 52472234660667192452❤1❤🔥1custom 54472479227668191421custom 54476257467448798961
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @biseri_x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,273,534 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@biseri_x named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗯𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗿𝗶_𝘅🫶🏻” (@biseri_x), 43 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biseri_x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.