Channel
@birzhdrakon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
192subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002075658755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @birzhdrakon |
| Description | Не садовник, но ращу лимоны 🍋 💸 Забирай вредные советы, которые помогут остаться жить на одну пенсию и с кайфом ездить на маршрутке: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/zwnn8TFj6OW78Q Вопросы: @Trade_Dragon_Official |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/birzhdrakon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 192 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 192 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
285 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 55 | 19.3% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 17.9% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 14.0% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 13.7% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 12.3% | |
| 🤣 | 29 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 8.07% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.40% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.702% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.702% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.702% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 18 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фонда не меньше чем крипта, разумеется, реагирует на политические и околополитические события, вот тут подраскатали Маска чутка и в целом по фактам разложили, почему Тесле может быть капец: https://lenta.ru/articles/2025/03/17/mask/ Хорошо, что именно такие два стула предлагают Илону, потому что могло быть и хуже 😂
❤3👍3🤣3
Пока, правда, неясно, будут ли там ещё какие-то активы (он уточнил, что биткоин, Ethereum и другие «ценные» криптовалюты также войдут в резерв). Но все три упомянутые монеты резко выросли на 15% и более после его поста, биткоин также резко прибавил порядка 3,5%.
🔥5👍4❤2🤩2
🔆 Трамп создаёт стратегический резерв цифровых активов, включающий Solana (SOL), XRP компании Ripple и Cardano (ADA). «Резерв криптовалют США укрепит этот критически важный сектор после долгих лет коррупционных атак со стороны администрации Байдена», — РБК цитирует Трампа, добавляя, что он планирует сделать США «криптостолицей мира».
👍3👏3🔥3
Биток знатно откатился назад, но всё равно находится на довольно высоком уровне. Среди причин (их туева хуча, конечно, включая главную — воля маркетмейкера) также называют, что Bank of America вознамерился создать свой стейблкоин. То ли чтобы противостоять BTC, то ли чтобы спасти народ от такой волатильности. Поп-корн у нас есть, так что всё ок. Как и алгоритмы, помогающие зарабатывать и на росте, и на падении рынка…
👍4👏4🔥4
Если кто непонел, то разговор Трампа и Путина очень сильно колыхнул акции компаний, в первую очередь российских. Причём именно сам факт разговора, а не его содержание. А уже трактовки, слухи, домыслы — скорректировали рынок 😂😂😂
🤣6❤4😁3💯2
Ох уж эта фонда 😂
🤣6😁5💯4
Это он мой канал перечитал что ли?)) В любом случае звучит круто! «Никогда не продавайте свой Биткоин».
👍6👏6💯5😁2
🌷 Смешно слышать, когда говорят, что крипта — это типа «того самого» тюльпанового пузыря, ну или МММ. Это говорят люди, которые мыслят паттернами «купи и жди, когда вырастет». Фишка крипты в изменившемся мире за счёт ИТ-прогресса. Моментальные операции по биржам всего мира позволяют зарабатывать в моменте, в том числе на падающем рынке.
💯6❤5🔥5
В Сальвадоре провели шоу дронов. Угадайте, какие сюжеты основные?) Крипта — наступившее будущее!
🔥6❤4👏3😍2
Пока Трамп пытается пампить свои мемкоины, из России мне шлют уже такие фото 😂👍🏻
🔥5🤣4😁4❤2
Историческое фото: Илон Маск за секунду до того, как проиллюстрирует рост Биткоина на графике
🔥6🤣5💯3😁2
😂 Питер Шифф тут выдал базу как раз: «Китай опередил США в сфере искусственного интеллекта, запустив DeepSeek. Зато Америка ТОП-1, когда дело касается мемкоинов»…
👍5😁3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @birzhdrakon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 293,051 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биржевой дракон 🐉” (@birzhdrakon), 192 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/birzhdrakon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.