Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for био пущка

Channel

био пущка

@biopushochkao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003937385961
TypeChannel
Username@biopushochkao
Created19 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/biopushochkao

Growth

12314313313 August 2026 — 126 subscribers13 August 2026 — 129 subscribers21 August 2026 — 143 subscribers28 August 2026 — 123 subscribers6 September 2026 — 131 subscribers12 September 2026 — 131 subscribers14 September 2026 — 137 subscribers13713 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 21:18137+6
12 Sept 2026, 03:22131no change
6 Sept 2026, 23:21131+8
28 Aug 2026, 08:24123-20
21 Aug 2026, 02:47143+14
13 Aug 2026, 11:58129+3
13 Aug 2026, 02:33126first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held15 (19 May 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total180
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

766 reactions across 7 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54181914468071937287710.1%
custom 5354837380656292133638.22%
custom 5406721109577996443617.96%
🕊617.96%
custom 5458452341390862697597.70%
custom 5249266182577496023567.31%
custom 5402358926043807861557.18%
custom 5458438223833360421405.22%
custom 5357332979993565599395.09%
⚡364.70%
custom 5249437745046132546324.18%
custom 5471911072384454363293.79%
custom 5215326990227229165283.66%
custom 5443117323869249301243.13%
custom 5273762567204909656233.00%
custom 5465534647972682361233.00%
custom 5465549757667630605233.00%
💘233.00%
custom 523328295141168769781.04%
custom 522458998055424892320.261%
3 further kinds40.522%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @biopushochkao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTC7 viewsread 12 September 2026

а давайте в интерактиве поучавствуете🦭

11 Sept 2026, 19:28 UTC9 viewsread 12 September 2026

я из инфо убрала типологии, потому что я тупой ларп и тд, кому ето вообще надо

9 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC65 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🎀𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 .... вы как патерн в сапере! Условия: 1. подписка на это инфо, без дальнейшей отписки 2. рт в свой активный тгк(любым способом) 3. доки и юз моно шрифтом 2/5 допы 0/3 open/close

9 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 12 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52245899805542489232custom 53575579933302018832custom 52223560692793545651custom 52425890202607084551custom 54181914468071937281

7 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC31 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @cheriescoquettePhoto

🤩озыгрыш на почти 2к пдп ! 🦷 🌟🥹💕ризовые места :: ❤️ 𝟢𝟣. нфт 𝟢𝟤. 150 звёзд 𝟢𝟥. 100 звёзд 𝟢𝟦. эмодзи пак с любым персонажем (+ - 150 эмодзи) 🌟🥹💕словия розыгрыша :: 🧪 𝟢𝟣. подписаться на @cheriescoquette & @eggchan1rl без дальнейшей отписки 🎀 𝟢𝟤. рт не стикером в своё инфо / активный канал от 30+ пдп 🎀 𝟢𝟥. написать в км свой номер, ссылку рт и юз моношрифтом прошу не путаться ! 🎀 🌟🥹💕тоги :: 12.09. 🕯 🥛перекрута не будет 🎀

12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC445 views87 reactions1 Starread 12 September 2026
Poll

🎀ⲏ૦ ɑʀ૯ ⲩ૦υ?

  1. 🎀🎀riend 🖤8%
  2. 🌷🎀ant to meet 🌟13%
  3. 🌷🎀asserby🙂32%
  4. 🤩🎀ater 🤩12%
  5. ⭐️🎀lassmate 🫥1%
  6. 🌷🎀n acquaintance 🤩7%
  7. 🌷🎀an 🥺44%
  8. 🏵🎀ove me ❤️15%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 540672110957799644317custom 541819144680719372814custom 545845234139086269712custom 54023589260438078618custom 53573329799935655997🕊6custom 53548373806562921336custom 54584382238333604216

12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC372 views100 reactions1 Starread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @kinncorePhoto

❌ᶻz ◟❤️ PUSHOK 𝖢𝖮𝖱𝖤 — ВИНСМОУК САНДЖИ ( #onepiece )

custom 540235892604380786117custom 540672110957799644314custom 535483738065629213313custom 54584382238333604219🕊8custom 53573329799935655998custom 54181914468071937288custom 54584523413908626978

12 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC362 views93 reactions3 Starsread 12 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 535483738065629213316custom 540235892604380786114custom 541819144680719372814custom 54584382238333604218🕊7custom 53573329799935655997custom 54067211095779964437custom 54584523413908626977

12 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC365 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤍🎀'm 🎀ushok 🤩dm ᅠ 🤩 only🤩🌟+🏁🤩 🤩🤩 🤩😺anon sfp🤩fandoms🪦

12 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC390 views104 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Photo

🎀ni ηы੮ɑ૯੮૯ςь ηƿяⲙ ж૦ςκ૦ ⲏɑɞяਡɑ੮ь ςɞ૦૯ ⲙⲏ૯ⲏυ૯; ∂ɑɞυ੮૯ ⲏɑ жɑʌ૦ς੮ь; ɾυη૯ƿ૦η૯κɑ; ⲏ૯ⲏɑɞυ∂υ੮૯ ςɑⲏ∂жυ; ઠʌ૦κ ઠ૯ਡ ૦ઠъяςⲏ૯ⲏυя; η૯∂૦,ਡ૦૦ υ ੮∂ ; жυɞ૦∂૯ƿы;ⲏɑⲙ૯ƿ૯ⲏⲏыύ υɾⲏ૦ƿ; ςʌυɞ ʌυ૫ⲏ૦ύ υⲏɸ૦ƿⲙɑцυυ; ⲏ૯ η૦ⲏυⲙɑ૯੮૯ "ⲏ૯੮"; ʌ૦жь; ɸƴ∂κ૦ƿ੮ⲏυцы; ƿɑਡɾ૦ɞ૦ƿы η૦ ਡɞ૦ⲏκƴ/ɾς; ਡɑς੮ɑɞʌя૯੮૯ ∂૯ʌɑ੮ь ૫੮૦-੮૦ ς੮ƿɑⲏⲏ૦૯; ૦ςƴж∂૯ⲏυ૯ υⲏ੮૯ƿ૯ς૦ɞ; ⲏ૯ η૦ⲏυⲙɑ૯੮૯ ૦૫૯ɞυ∂ⲏыύ ƿ૦ɸʌ; ઠыɞਘυ૯ "∂ƿƴਡья" (υⲏ૦ɾ∂ɑ ∂૯ʌɑю੮ςя υςκʌю૫૯ⲏυя)

custom 545845234139086269717custom 540672110957799644315⚡11custom 535483738065629213311custom 53573329799935655999custom 54584382238333604219🕊8custom 52332829514116876978

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @biopushochkao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

🎀ⲏ૦ ɑʀ૯ ⲩ૦υ?

  1. 🎀🎀riend 🖤8%
  2. 🌷🎀ant to meet 🌟13%
  3. 🌷🎀asserby🙂32%
  4. 🤩🎀ater 🤩12%
  5. ⭐️🎀lassmate 🫥1%
  6. 🌷🎀n acquaintance 🤩7%
  7. 🌷🎀an 🥺44%
  8. 🏵🎀ove me ❤️15%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“био пущка” (@biopushochkao), 137 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biopushochkao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.